2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.05.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A lightweight biomechanical energy harvester with high power density and low metabolic cost

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All these power ranges are very minimal as the piezoelectric, triboelectric, and microelectromagnetic harvesters were used as the generators. Longhan Xie et al [26] harvested 6.47 W at walking speed of 1.41 m/s and Jun Fan et al [28] were able to generate 4.1 W at 1.5 m/s walking speed, at the lower walking speed of 1.34 m/s minimum RMS power generated in this study was 5.09 W and maximum RMS power generated was 6.93 W. Collier Apgar et al [27] were able to generate 8.43 W at 5211 RPM, whereby in this study the RMS power generated at 800 RPM was in the range of 11.2 W to 14.95 W. This was comparatively higher power at a lower speed. Maxwell Donelan et al [20] designed a device that generated 3.5 ± 0.35 W per device at 1.5 m/s walking speed under continuous generation mode.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All these power ranges are very minimal as the piezoelectric, triboelectric, and microelectromagnetic harvesters were used as the generators. Longhan Xie et al [26] harvested 6.47 W at walking speed of 1.41 m/s and Jun Fan et al [28] were able to generate 4.1 W at 1.5 m/s walking speed, at the lower walking speed of 1.34 m/s minimum RMS power generated in this study was 5.09 W and maximum RMS power generated was 6.93 W. Collier Apgar et al [27] were able to generate 8.43 W at 5211 RPM, whereby in this study the RMS power generated at 800 RPM was in the range of 11.2 W to 14.95 W. This was comparatively higher power at a lower speed. Maxwell Donelan et al [20] designed a device that generated 3.5 ± 0.35 W per device at 1.5 m/s walking speed under continuous generation mode.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the 5.1 km/h walking speed, the harvester generates a maximum power of 6.47 W. Collier Apgar et al [27] use a brushless DC motor as the generator by integrating a gear train with a 1:86 ratio. At 5211 RPM, the generator produces 8.43 W. Jun Fan et al [28] investigated a knee-mounted harvester with a cable-pulley mechanism. This cable-pulley mechanism converts the flexion and extension gait cycle of the knee to electrical power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower limbs pull the cable in the swing stage of the walking cycle, one end of each cable is connected to the human lower tibia, and the other end F I G U R E 7 Different energy harvesters with center mass motion during human walking. A, An energy harvester that convert intermittent, bidirectional, low-speed and high torque mechanical power into electrical energy developed by Li et al 75 B, A energy harvester with a spring damping mechanism with spiral spring and generator developed by Xie et al 76 C, A knee-mounted biomechanical energy harvester developed by Chen et al 77 D, An innovative biomechanical energy harvester based on the regenerative braking developed by Cervera et al 78 E, A light cable pulley harvester installed on the knee joint developed by Fan et al 79 F, An energy harvester with a one-way clutch driving gear system developed by Rubinshtein et al 80 G, An energy harvester capture the linear displacement between the buttocks and ankles developed by Michael et al 81 H, An energy harvester based on lightweight large fiber composite (MFC) developed by Gao et al 82 [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] is connected to the pulley. The movement of two limbs is to be incorporated into a single generating unit.…”
Section: Electromagnetic Inductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Fan et al used a cable‐driven mechanism to reduce the mass of the energy harvester, obtaining an average power of 4.1 W with reduced COH and TCOH. [ 69 ] Although these devices can achieve watt‐level power output, the complicated mechanical structures result in heavy weight of the energy harvesters. To further cut down the weight and improve the wearing comfort of the device, various smart material‐based energy harvesters have been developed.…”
Section: Human Motion‐based Energy Harvesting Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 73 ] The cable‐driven mechanism provides an effective solution to reduce the effect of weight and position on TCOH. [ 50,68,69 ]…”
Section: Human Motion‐based Energy Harvesting Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%