2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2906326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Lightweight Cellular Automata Based Encryption Technique for IoT Applications

Abstract: The Internet of Things (IoT) devices are resource-constrained devices with limitations such as low computation power, low communication capabilities, low bandwidths, high latency, and short-lived power. Therefore, securing communication among these devices is a key challenge for various sensitive applications. However, the conventional encryption and decryption algorithms, known as ciphers, cannot be implemented because of their inherent complexities of implementation and power requirements. One of the promisi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, traditional standard encryption methods, like the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), cannot be employed in IoT applications because of their disadvantages that do not fit the restricted memory and computational capacities of IoT machines [66]. These challenges can be met by suggesting lightweight encryption methods for these resource-restricted machines (see e.g., [67]- [72]). As an example, khattabi et al [72] suggested to utilize the conventional encryption simply for the first block of data in a particular frame (or superframe) being sent.…”
Section: Complexity Reduction and Internet-of-things (Iot) Applicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, traditional standard encryption methods, like the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), cannot be employed in IoT applications because of their disadvantages that do not fit the restricted memory and computational capacities of IoT machines [66]. These challenges can be met by suggesting lightweight encryption methods for these resource-restricted machines (see e.g., [67]- [72]). As an example, khattabi et al [72] suggested to utilize the conventional encryption simply for the first block of data in a particular frame (or superframe) being sent.…”
Section: Complexity Reduction and Internet-of-things (Iot) Applicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, conventional standard encryption algorithms, such as the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), cannot be used in IoT applications due to their drawbacks (as mentioned earlier) that do not fit the limited memory space and computational capabilities of IoT devices [14]. To encounter these challenges, lightweight encryption methods have been proposed in literature to be implemented on these resource-constrained devices [15]- [25]. In [15], a lightweight cellular automata-based encryption algorithm has been proposed for IoT applications, where sensors' data is encrypted at the perception layer and decrypted at the gateway's network layer.…”
Section: Tth Wireless Communication Link In General Is Insecure and Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To encounter these challenges, lightweight encryption methods have been proposed in literature to be implemented on these resource-constrained devices [15]- [25]. In [15], a lightweight cellular automata-based encryption algorithm has been proposed for IoT applications, where sensors' data is encrypted at the perception layer and decrypted at the gateway's network layer. As compared to classical encryption algorithms like the data encryption standard (DES), the proposed algorithm in [15] has shown higher efficiency in terms of running time and implementation complexity.…”
Section: Tth Wireless Communication Link In General Is Insecure and Omentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ensuring privacy in smart city IoT nodes is challenging for several reasons. Firstly, the CPU in IoT devices is minimal and cannot compute complex algorithms [8][9][10][11][12]. Secondly, the power consumption of the security algorithm should be low since the majority of IoT devices work with a battery [9,[11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%