1979
DOI: 10.1107/s0567739479001443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A limited-range step-scan method for collecting X-ray diffraction data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data were then reduced to integrated intensities using the procedure of Hanson et al 21 , which fits gaussian profiles over smoothly varying backgrounds. Standard corrections were made for Lorentz and polarization factors, absorption 22 and scale 23 .…”
Section: Diffraction Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These data were then reduced to integrated intensities using the procedure of Hanson et al 21 , which fits gaussian profiles over smoothly varying backgrounds. Standard corrections were made for Lorentz and polarization factors, absorption 22 and scale 23 .…”
Section: Diffraction Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the three aromatic residues are within 4° of the expected transverse conformation at χ 2 , but Tyr 29 has χ 2 = 55°. The disulphide torsion angles, which are also expected to favour ±90°, are −79° (3-40), 106° (4-32) and −86° (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26).…”
Section: Molecular Conformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 09--20 step-scan technique (Hanson, Watenpaugh, Sieker & Jensen, 1979) was used to collect data at a rate of approximately 3000 reflections per day. Backgrounds were assumed to be a function only of 0 and representative values were obtained at the end of data collection by counting pseudo-reflections between the reciprocal-lattice rows.…”
Section: Data Collection and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wyckoff, Doscher, Tsernoglou, Inagami, Johnson, Hardman, Allwell, Kelly & Richards, 1967;Hanson, Watenpaugh, Sieker & Jensen, 1979). These usually combine a limited number of counting steps in the region of the peak maximum with some form of averaged background; this is frequently assumed to be a function of 20 only and is estimated by scanning between reciprocal-lattice rows, although local empirical corrections may be necessary (Hanson, Watenpaugh, Sieker & Jensen, 1979). Our method could operate similarly, but we prefer to measure some background in each scan to avoid assumptions about its behaviour; an accurate value is particularly important in the estimation of weak reflections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Hanson, Watenpaugh, Sieker & Jensen (1979) have reported a method which may be thought of as an approximation to Diamond's (1969) method and to the one that we present below. It is a two-pass procedure which fits Gaussian peak shapes to the vectors of counts.…”
Section: Var[i(e)ljl=p + [W/(n--w)12 (B + B2) (14)mentioning
confidence: 99%