2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2013.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A linear combination-based weighted least square approach for target localization with noisy range measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the previous methods [5,6,8,11,23,25] are based on the least square procedure. Thus, the source position is computed by…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Most of the previous methods [5,6,8,11,23,25] are based on the least square procedure. Thus, the source position is computed by…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are algebraic method and matrix method for the multistation localization system [5]. Algebraic methods mainly include the TOA method [19] which uses the circles produced by range measurements at other sensors to find the position of the transmitter at the intersection of circles in two dimensions or spheres in three dimensions and the AOA method [10] which calculates the target position from the point of intersection of bearing lines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For different mounting target, digital aircraft assembly tooling need to adapt to dynamic assembly environments, digital measuring device for measuring a benchmark during assembly gradually moving generally [2,3]. Digital measuring instruments relied upon in the traditional sense, the calculation method of measurement results also tend to use the least squares method and weighted least squares method [4,5]. These methods can be used for general reference solving, but it is difficult to meet the positioning error criterion in assembly areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%