2013
DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slt105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A linear distribution of orbits in compact planetary systems?

Abstract: We report a linear ordering of orbits in a sample of multiple extrasolar planetary systems with super-Earth planets. We selected 20 cases, mostly discovered by the Kepler mission, hosting at least four planets within ∼ 0.5 au. The semi-major axis a n of an n-th planet in each system of this sample obeys a(n) = a 1 + (n − 1) ∆ a, where a 1 is the semi-major axis of the innermost orbit and ∆ a is a spacing between subsequent planets, which are specific for a particular system. For instance, the Kepler-33 system … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The migration mechanism and resonance trapping is likely responsible, although in quite smaller scale when concerning the orbits and planetary masses, for creating multiple systems of super-Earth planets discovered by the KEPLER mission (Borucki & Koch 2011;Batalha 2013). A significant sample of KEPLER systems involving four and more planets are found very close to multiple MMRs which might be also explained by a common, inward migration (Migaszewski et al 2013, and references therein).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The migration mechanism and resonance trapping is likely responsible, although in quite smaller scale when concerning the orbits and planetary masses, for creating multiple systems of super-Earth planets discovered by the KEPLER mission (Borucki & Koch 2011;Batalha 2013). A significant sample of KEPLER systems involving four and more planets are found very close to multiple MMRs which might be also explained by a common, inward migration (Migaszewski et al 2013, and references therein).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Dissipative dynamics are thought to drive planets into resonant configurations; subsequent planet-planet scattering or stochastic migration forces can randomize the period ratios. Thus, the ratio of Kepler orbital periods in exoplanetary systems is a critical test of planet formation theories (e.g., Rein 2012;Migaszewski et al 2013 Kepler has provided enormous insight into the exoplanetary period ratio distribution. First, Kepler has identified an order of magnitude more planetary systems to date than all other methods and observations combined.…”
Section: Application To Period Ratio Distribution Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kepler-11 system (Lissauer et al 2011) is a system with six transiting planets. A full dynamical analysis has been carried out for this system, giving constraints on the masses of all planets (Migaszewski et al 2013;Lissauer et al 2013). Several of the planets, despite being only a few Earth masses, have low densities which require H/He atmospheres; this result is puzzling in light of core-accretion theory, which would not predict planets so low in mass to accumulate substantial gaseous envelopes.…”
Section: Kepler 11d/ementioning
confidence: 99%