2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.03.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A linear inverse method to reconstruct paleo-topography

Abstract: Landscape evolution provides insight into the tectonic and erosional processes that have shaped the topography observed today. However, in many cases, an estimate of an earlier topography is required to make first-order interpretations about volumes of sediment eroded or depths of fluvial incision, or to serve as an initial condition in landscape evolution models. This paper presents a means to reconstruct paleo-topography in two dimensions in areas that have experienced an increase in incision using available… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
(148 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnitude of fluvial incision, associated with changes in rock uplift, can be estimated from the relict topography upstream of major non‐lithological knickpoints (Berlin & Anderson, 2007; Gallen et al., 2013; Miller et al., 2013; Schildgen et al., 2012). In particular, the reconstructed river projection from the relict landscape allows permits determination of the supposed elevation of the paleo‐base level and hence the magnitude of minimum incision/surface uplift and the paleo‐relief before the development of the knickpoints (i.e., predating uplift; Fox, 2019; Heidarzadeh et al., 2017; Olivetti et al., 2016). These estimates, however, represent the incision into a specific surface which may be undergoing continued erosion itself.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of fluvial incision, associated with changes in rock uplift, can be estimated from the relict topography upstream of major non‐lithological knickpoints (Berlin & Anderson, 2007; Gallen et al., 2013; Miller et al., 2013; Schildgen et al., 2012). In particular, the reconstructed river projection from the relict landscape allows permits determination of the supposed elevation of the paleo‐base level and hence the magnitude of minimum incision/surface uplift and the paleo‐relief before the development of the knickpoints (i.e., predating uplift; Fox, 2019; Heidarzadeh et al., 2017; Olivetti et al., 2016). These estimates, however, represent the incision into a specific surface which may be undergoing continued erosion itself.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…such that lithologic variability in setting hillslope morphology should be limited. In addition, while common elsewhere in the OCR (Franczyk et al, 2019;LaHusen et al, 2020;Roering et al, 2005), the sites we have selected for analysis do not exhibit pronounced evidence of deep-seated landslides, which may bias C HT values, complicating comparison to known erosion rates from CRN analysis. As such, Hadsall Creek, the NFSR, and Bear Creek provide an ideal spectrum of hillslopes that allows for assessment of C HT measurement techniques (Fig.…”
Section: Study Site: Oregon Coast Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reconstruct the paleo‐topography, we follow the simplification as in Fox (2019), which assumes that topography was in steady state prior to an uplift rate change. By discretizing the river profile into a limited number ( N ) of pixels, the present‐day ( t * = 0) elevation of pixel i can be expressed in a discrete form (Fox, 2019; Goren et al., 2014) as zi=falsefalsej=1i(χjχj1)uj*, in which the pixels are ordered upstream from the outlet such that χ 0 = 0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reconstruct the paleo‐topography, we follow the simplification as in Fox (2019), which assumes that topography was in steady state prior to an uplift rate change. By discretizing the river profile into a limited number ( N ) of pixels, the present‐day ( t * = 0) elevation of pixel i can be expressed in a discrete form (Fox, 2019; Goren et al., 2014) as zi=falsefalsej=1i(χjχj1)uj*, in which the pixels are ordered upstream from the outlet such that χ 0 = 0. Then by dividing the uplift history into a small number ( q ) of intervals ( q ≪ N ), solving u * becomes an overdetermined inverse problem (Goren et al., 2014), for which we optimize using a linear least‐squares method (with the lsqnonneg function in the MATLAB software).…”
Section: Inverting the River Profile For Incision History And Paleotopographymentioning
confidence: 99%