2023
DOI: 10.1109/tcyb.2022.3164658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Linear Time-Varying Inequality Approach for Prescribed Time Stability and Stabilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If T$$ T $$ can be prescribed as any number (usual in the design), then prescribed‐time control will be used instead of finite‐ and fixed‐time control. The problem of predefining the settling time in finite‐time control, which might be referred to as the prescribed‐time control problem, was investigated in many references such as References 44,46,48–51. Though the constant T$$ T $$ in the fixed‐time control scheme can be assigned in advance by suitably assigning control parameters, the true settling time still depends on the initial condition, which is different from the prescribed‐time control scheme where the true settling time is independent of the initial condition.…”
Section: Preliminaries and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If T$$ T $$ can be prescribed as any number (usual in the design), then prescribed‐time control will be used instead of finite‐ and fixed‐time control. The problem of predefining the settling time in finite‐time control, which might be referred to as the prescribed‐time control problem, was investigated in many references such as References 44,46,48–51. Though the constant T$$ T $$ in the fixed‐time control scheme can be assigned in advance by suitably assigning control parameters, the true settling time still depends on the initial condition, which is different from the prescribed‐time control scheme where the true settling time is independent of the initial condition.…”
Section: Preliminaries and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the issue of finite/fixed/predefined-time output feedback control for nonlinear systems and multiagent systems has been widely concerned by scholars. 10,19,[38][39][40][41][42][43] Several effective methods have been developed for achieving finite/fixed/prescribed-time stability for nonlinear systems and multiagent systems, including sliding mode control method, [44][45][46][47][48] time-varying function technique, 33,[49][50][51] and so on. For example, in Reference 39, the problem of global finite-time stabilization by output feedback for a class of nonlinear systems was considered and an output feedback controller was proposed by using the homogeneous domination approach, in Reference 41 a novel continuous and nonsingular practical prescribed-time consensus control law was designed on the basis of the distributed practical prescribed-time observer and the problem of practical prescribed-time stability of multiagent systems under the directed topology based on output-feedback consensus control was achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of these problems, prescribed-time stabilization has been proposed, where the settlingtime can be chosen in advance. Existing Lyapunov-based criteria that can achieve prescribed-time stabilization are mainly based on time varying high-gain feedback (see, for example, [5], [22], [27], [30], [32], [33] and [34]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And the convergence time of transient error cannot be determined. Although the prescribed time control method [46, 47] proposed in recent years can solve the problem of transient error convergence time, it will ignore overshoot, steady-state error, and other factors. Therefore, it is necessary to design a unified predetermined performance control strategy considering overshoot, transient convergence time, transient error, and steady-state error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%