2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11340-008-9158-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Linearized Method to Measure Dynamic Friction of Microdevices

Abstract: We propose and evaluate a linearized method to measure dynamic friction between micromachined surfaces. This linearized method reduces the number of data points needed to obtain dynamic friction data, minimizing the effect of wear on sliding surfaces during the measurement. We find that the coefficient of dynamic friction is lower than the coefficient of static friction, while the adhesive pressure is indistinguishable for the two measurements. Furthermore, after an initial detailed measurement is made on a de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, there is good evidence that FOTAS is chemically attached, and it is expected to act as a dry boundary lubricant. The measured value of dynamic coefficient of friction with the same device was μ d = 0.25 [25], [26], in accordance with this expectation. The FOTAS surface is hydrophobic with a water contact angle of 106 • ; capillary condensation in laboratory air due to ambient moisture is not expected.…”
Section: Device and Test Proceduressupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Hence, there is good evidence that FOTAS is chemically attached, and it is expected to act as a dry boundary lubricant. The measured value of dynamic coefficient of friction with the same device was μ d = 0.25 [25], [26], in accordance with this expectation. The FOTAS surface is hydrophobic with a water contact angle of 106 • ; capillary condensation in laboratory air due to ambient moisture is not expected.…”
Section: Device and Test Proceduressupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The data presented here is for oxide-coated devices, which were found [32] to have shorter lifetimes than monolayer-coated devices. Other work we have reported [23,24,[34][35][36][37] was taken on nanotractors monolayer coatings applied according to the procedure detailed by Hankins et al [33]. For those tests, friction results are highly consistent in the first few hundreds of tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%