2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10915-015-0017-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Linearly Fourth Order Multirate Runge–Kutta Method with Error Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adaptive time discretization methods are the state of the art for ODE solvers, while, for PDE solvers, spatial adaptivity techniques are also widely used. Local time step adaptation is feasible in the framework of so-called local time stepping or multirate approaches, where different components of the system can have different time step sizes (see Bonaventura et al, 2020; Carciopolo et al, 2019; Fok, 2015; Gear and Wells, 1984; Sandu, 2019; Savcenco et al, 2007; Seny et al, 2014), which are however still far from mainstream for most applications. For PDE solvers, local spatial adaptivity techniques are also very common (Bangerth and Rannacher, 2013; Bangerth et al, 2012), but their incorporation in operational applications is still a research topic (see, for example,.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaptive time discretization methods are the state of the art for ODE solvers, while, for PDE solvers, spatial adaptivity techniques are also widely used. Local time step adaptation is feasible in the framework of so-called local time stepping or multirate approaches, where different components of the system can have different time step sizes (see Bonaventura et al, 2020; Carciopolo et al, 2019; Fok, 2015; Gear and Wells, 1984; Sandu, 2019; Savcenco et al, 2007; Seny et al, 2014), which are however still far from mainstream for most applications. For PDE solvers, local spatial adaptivity techniques are also very common (Bangerth and Rannacher, 2013; Bangerth et al, 2012), but their incorporation in operational applications is still a research topic (see, for example,.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now describe in detail the time step refinement and partitioning strategy that we have used in the multirate algorithm described in section 2. Our approach is based on the strategy proposed for an explicit Runge Kutta multirate method in [7], where the time steps for refinement are obtained from the error estimates of the global step. The user specified tolerance plays an important role in the partitioning of the system.…”
Section: The Time Step Refinement and Partitioning Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the cubic Hermite interpolant can be employed to maintain higher accuracy also for stiff problems in the framework of a multirate approach. The proposed self-adjusting multirate TR-BDF2 method is equipped here with a partitioning and time step selection criterion based on the technique proposed in [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, many methods have been investigated as starting points for more sophisticated LTS methods, including both substep [5,6,7,8,9,10] and multistep [2,11,12] integrators and also less common methods such as leapfrog [11,13], Richardson extrapolation [14], ADER [15], and implicit methods [16]. Demirel et al [17] have even explored LTS schemes constructed from multiple unrelated GTS integrators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%