2005
DOI: 10.1090/conm/368/06788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Liouville type theorem for some conformally invariant fully nonlinear equations

Abstract: Following the approach in our earlier paper [2] and using the gradient estimates developed in [2] and [3], we give another Liouville type theorem for some conformally invariant fully nonlinear equations. Various Liouville type theorems for conformally invariant equations have been obtained by Obata, Gidas-Ni-Nirenberg, CaffarelliGidas-Spruck, Viaclovsky, Chang-Gursky-Yang, and Li-Li. For these, as well as for related works, see [2] and the references therein.For n ≥ 3, let S n×n be the set of n × n real symmet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has played an important role in the proof of Li and Li ([19,20,23]) of the Harnack type inequality and the existence and compactness theorems for a fully nonlinear version of the Yamabe problem on locally conformally flat manifolds, under the circumstance that the associated Liouville type theorems were not available. Later they obtained such Liouville type theorems in [21] and [22], see also [23]. Our proof of Theorem 1.1 is by contradiction argument, as in the proof of (14) in [31], and therefore does not yield explicit constants δ and C 0 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has played an important role in the proof of Li and Li ([19,20,23]) of the Harnack type inequality and the existence and compactness theorems for a fully nonlinear version of the Yamabe problem on locally conformally flat manifolds, under the circumstance that the associated Liouville type theorems were not available. Later they obtained such Liouville type theorems in [21] and [22], see also [23]. Our proof of Theorem 1.1 is by contradiction argument, as in the proof of (14) in [31], and therefore does not yield explicit constants δ and C 0 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We argue by contradiction. Suppose that (22) does not hold, then for someā > 0 there exist a sequence of Riemannian metrics {g k } of the form (20) and satisfying (18) and (19), but for some k → 0 + and some solutions u k of (21) with g replaced by g k , we have…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11 For N =mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aobing Li proved in [11] that positive C 1,1 (R 3 ) solutions to F 2 (A u ) = 0 are constants, and, for all k and n, positive C 3 (R n ) solutions to F k (A u ) = 0 are constants. Our proof is completely different.…”
Section: Theorem 12 Let U ⊂ Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will show in Lemma 2 below that the Hopf lemma holds for our equation. Then the argument in [26] can be applied to our equation.…”
Section: Positive Curvature Casementioning
confidence: 99%