2021
DOI: 10.1111/1911-3838.12279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Literature Review on Corporate Governance Mechanisms: Past, Present, and Future*

Abstract: This study is a literature review on corporate governance. Its objective is to consolidate our knowledge in this field, examine its evolution, and propose avenues for future research. In our review of the past and present literature on various governance measures and their effect on firm performance, we find that the empirical results are mixed for many of the governance mechanisms studied. We propose that these mixed results may be due to applying a “one size fits all” set of governance measures, which is not… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
6

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
(139 reference statements)
0
6
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Relatedly, Chen et al (2014) and Cho and Lee (2017) propose integrating agency theory and a resource-based theoretical perspective to understand the nexus between governance and internationalisation in family firms. Di Vito and Trottier (2021, p.17) suggest advancement in the CG space will occur through the employment of a greater diversity of theory from the areas of management and psychology, such as sensemaking, institutional theory and strategic renewal. Jain and Jamali (2016, p. 267) urge researchers to explore theories from “sociology and socio-psychology” when exploring expanding board roles and the influence of stakeholder groups other than shareholders on CG.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Relatedly, Chen et al (2014) and Cho and Lee (2017) propose integrating agency theory and a resource-based theoretical perspective to understand the nexus between governance and internationalisation in family firms. Di Vito and Trottier (2021, p.17) suggest advancement in the CG space will occur through the employment of a greater diversity of theory from the areas of management and psychology, such as sensemaking, institutional theory and strategic renewal. Jain and Jamali (2016, p. 267) urge researchers to explore theories from “sociology and socio-psychology” when exploring expanding board roles and the influence of stakeholder groups other than shareholders on CG.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SMEs are widely variable across, for example, national, regional and sectoral contexts and internally regarding growth intentions and outcomes. With Di Vito and Trottier (2021), we caution against a "one-size-fits-all" approach to understanding CG. Research must be conducted in a way that captures and enables knowledge generation from this heterogeneity.…”
Section: Contextualised Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common challenge that is cited in bibliometric analysis studies and systematic literature reviews is coming up with an appropriate search query that strikes a balance between getting the maximum articles while at the same time minimising the frequency of irrelevant articles (Romanelli et al , 2021). To come up with the appropriate search query, this study reviewed previous studies that have been done on the systematic and bibliometric analysis of corporate governance studies (such as Alex, 2021; Almaqtari et al , 2020; Di Vito and Trottier, 2021). The final search string formed, guided by previous literature, was {corporate governance} OR {board structure} OR {board composition*}.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the systematic reviews on corporate have tended to concentrate on the developed (Di Vito and Trottier, 2021) markets and emerging markets (Almaqtari et al , 2020) and frontier markets (Alex, 2021). Less has been done on synthesising literature on corporate governance using “standalone [2]” markets as well as fragile markets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proportional to the volume of studies, MFIs have been rarely addressed. Second, either for nonfinancial institutions or for MFIs, the empirical results are far from consensus (Di Vito and Trottier, 2021, for a recent literature review). Third, most MFI governance studies are focused on the impact of internal governance.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%