Aim: This study was conducted to evaluate bone changes around micro textured acid-washed surface implants and sandblasted and acid-etched surface-treated implants in the mandible of fully edentulous patients.
Materials and methods:Assessment of marginal bone loss around the implant was performed using cone beam radiography. Bone resorption was measured as the distance between the implantabutment connection and the first implant-bone contact. Implant dimensions, width and length, were used for software calibration to compensate for radiographic magnification. The two installed implants were early-loaded. Marginal bone loss was evaluated during the early loading period after 6w ad 3m months by subtracting bone level values in millimeters of buccal and lingual aspects of each implant from values at base line and averaged .Results : As a result of these studies, there is no statistically significant difference in bone loss for Implant I (microtextured, acid-washed implant surface treatment) compared to Implant II (Neodent Aqua, sandblasted acid-washed implant surface treatment) However, it was shown statistically that there was a significant difference between the two assessment of bone loss between two periods of 6 W and 3 M.
Conclusion:Based on this discussion, it can be concluded that both implants with different surface treatments have a desirable effect on the alveolar bone surrounding both mandibular implants.