2016
DOI: 10.1002/2015wr018186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A lithofacies approach for modeling non‐Fickian solute transport in a heterogeneous alluvial aquifer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
78
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
6
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This skewness value not only qualitatively agrees with the anomalous transport conditions observed at this site, it also suggests that such conditions may be mainly the effect of the low geological entropy of the aquifer. This is consistent with the presence of connected structures and organized features as suggested by several previous studies [ Dogan et al ., ; Bianchi and Zheng , ; Zheng et al ., , and references therein].…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This skewness value not only qualitatively agrees with the anomalous transport conditions observed at this site, it also suggests that such conditions may be mainly the effect of the low geological entropy of the aquifer. This is consistent with the presence of connected structures and organized features as suggested by several previous studies [ Dogan et al ., ; Bianchi and Zheng , ; Zheng et al ., , and references therein].…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The real and synthetic aquifers used for generating the second set of validation data include: the aquifer at the MADE site [ Zheng et al ., ], as per the lithological model presented by Bianchi and Zheng []; the aquifer at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL P18), as per the statistical parameters of the hydrofacies models presented by Fogg et al . [], LaBolle and Fogg [], and Zhang et al .…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, because the scale of heterogeneity of alluvial lithofacies can be much finer than typical inter-borehole spacing [1][2][3][4][5], understanding how K varies in space from sparse hydraulic tests is inherently impractical. Alternatively, when numerous continuous-core boreholes are available, one can resort to geostatistics for simulating lithofacies at first step, and then obtain the K-field by assigning appropriate K to simulated lithofacies [6][7][8][9]. Geostatistics deals with prediction of any property (including discrete variables such as, for example, lithofacies) exhibiting some degree of spatial continuity [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%