2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.07.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A load–deformation formulation for CHS X- and K-joints in push-over analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 3a confirms the accuracy of the joint formulation against an experimentally measured load-deformation response [34] and the corresponding loading-deformation relationship computed from a large-deformation, elastic-plastic analysis for an X-joint [31]. subjected to symmetric brace loads [35].…”
Section: Load-deformation Response For Intact Jointssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fig. 3a confirms the accuracy of the joint formulation against an experimentally measured load-deformation response [34] and the corresponding loading-deformation relationship computed from a large-deformation, elastic-plastic analysis for an X-joint [31]. subjected to symmetric brace loads [35].…”
Section: Load-deformation Response For Intact Jointssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Qian et al [31] have proposed a dimensionless load-deformation relationship for circular hollow section X-and K-joints subjected to brace axial loads,…”
Section: Load-deformation Response For Intact Jointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Feng et al [29,30] investigated the performance of CFST joints under static loading. What's more, Lesani et al [31], Ju and Wang [32], Lvet al [33], Rong et al [34], Qian et al [35] performed a series of experimental and analytical investigations on the mechanical behaviour of tubular joints and developed different formulas for determining the ultimate strength of the tubular joints. Yin et al [36] conducted an experimental investigation on the hysteretic behavior of tubular N-joints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tubular joints are classified into spatial form and planar form according to their geometric forms. In 2012, Haque [1] et al conducted experimental research on 12 t-shaped and x-shaped intersecting nodes; Qian [2] et al proposed in 2013 the stress and deformation formulas of X -and k-shaped joints of round steel tubes applicable to the nappe analysis of steel truss structures. Subsequently, Qian [3] et al proposed a new fracture form to describe the ductile tear and brittle fracture failure of circular hollow section joints under monotonic load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%