Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3350755.3400217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A LOCAL Constant Approximation Factor Algorithm for Minimum Dominating Set of Certain Planar Graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper we propose a local approximation algorithm which is an extension of [2]. We prove that the approximation factor of this algorithm in planar triangle free graphs is 16 and 32 for MTDS problem and MDS problem, respectively.…”
Section: Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper we propose a local approximation algorithm which is an extension of [2]. We prove that the approximation factor of this algorithm in planar triangle free graphs is 16 and 32 for MTDS problem and MDS problem, respectively.…”
Section: Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there exist an algorithm with approximation factor of 52 for computing a MDS in planar graphs [10,20] in local model and an algorithm with approximation factor of 636 for anonymous networks [10,31]. In [2], they improved the approximation factor in anonymous networks to 18 in planar graphs without 4-cycles. For more information on local algorithms see [27].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that 5 is the right answer. In the second case, an 18-approximation is known [4], and there is no non-trivial lower bound. We refrain from conjecturing the right bound here -we simply point out that there is no reason yet to think 3 is out of reach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we focus instead on restricted subclasses of planar graphs. Better approximation ratios can be obtained with additional structural assumptions: 32 if the planar graph contains no triangle [3] and 18 if the planar graph contains no cycle of length four [4]. These bounds are not tight, and in fact we expect they can be improved significantly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Better approximation ratios are known for some special cases, e.g. 32 if the planar graph is triangle-free [1, Theorem 2.1], 18 if the planar graph has girth five [2] and 5 if the graph is outerplanar (and this bound is tight) [4, Theorem 1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%