2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2202.11339
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A local limit theorem for convergent random walks on relatively hyperbolic groups

Abstract: We study random walks on relatively hyperbolic groups whose law is convergent, in the sense that the derivative of its Green function is finite at the spectral radius. When parabolic subgroups are virtually abelian, we prove that for such a random walk satisfies a local limit theorem of the form pn(e, e) ∼ CR −n n −d/2 , where pn(e, e) is the probability of returning to the origin at time n, R is the inverse of the spectral radius of the random walk and d is the minimal rank of a parabolic subgroup along which… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where µ * n is the nth convolution power of µ and R is the inverse of the spectral radius of µ. This disproves a result of Candellero and Gilch [7] and a result of the authors of this paper that was stated in a first version of [11]. This also shows that the classification of local limit theorems on free products of the form Z d 1 * Z d 2 or more generally on relatively hyperbolic groups with respect to virtually abelian subgroups is incomplete.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…where µ * n is the nth convolution power of µ and R is the inverse of the spectral radius of µ. This disproves a result of Candellero and Gilch [7] and a result of the authors of this paper that was stated in a first version of [11]. This also shows that the classification of local limit theorems on free products of the form Z d 1 * Z d 2 or more generally on relatively hyperbolic groups with respect to virtually abelian subgroups is incomplete.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…Our main goal in this note is to disprove [7,Lemma 4.5] and a similar statement that appeared in a first version of [11]. In particular, we prove that the classification obtained in [7] is incomplete: we derive a local limit theorem on Z 3 * Z 5 of the form (1.1) but with unexpected exponent α = 5/3, and a local limit theorem on Z 3 * Z 6 which is not of the form (1.1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations