2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/964918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Local Region of Interest Imaging Method for Electrical Impedance Tomography with Internal Electrodes

Abstract: Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) is a very attractive functional imaging method despite the low sensitivity and resolution. The use of internal electrodes with the conventional reconstruction algorithms was not enough to enhance image resolution and accuracy in the region of interest (ROI). We propose a local ROI imaging method with internal electrodes developed from careful analysis of the sensitivity matrix that is designed to reduce the sensitivity of the voxels outside the local region and optimize th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference algorithm is to make the difference between the boundary voltage values of the same field obtained at two different times under the same excitation and use the difference to reconstruct the image so as to get the change of the impedance distribution in two different fields at different times. The typical difference algorithms include the back projection algorithm (Barber et al, 1983;Santos and Vogelius, 1990), the one-step Newton-Gauss method (Cheney et al, 2010), the sensitivity matrix method (Murai and Kagawa, 1985;Hyeuknam et al, 2013) and so on. Table 2 summarizes the above three differential algorithms.…”
Section: Inverse Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference algorithm is to make the difference between the boundary voltage values of the same field obtained at two different times under the same excitation and use the difference to reconstruct the image so as to get the change of the impedance distribution in two different fields at different times. The typical difference algorithms include the back projection algorithm (Barber et al, 1983;Santos and Vogelius, 1990), the one-step Newton-Gauss method (Cheney et al, 2010), the sensitivity matrix method (Murai and Kagawa, 1985;Hyeuknam et al, 2013) and so on. Table 2 summarizes the above three differential algorithms.…”
Section: Inverse Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After repeated calculation, the conductivity distribution problem of the whole circular object is transformed into the conductivity distribution problem of multiple single layers, which can simplify the calculation difficulty, but there will be instability. On the basis of previous research, Siltanen proposed a D-bar algorithm (Siltanen et al, 2001;Isaacson et al, 2006;Knudsen et al, 2007), which transforms the conductivity problem into a Schrodinger equation and then combines with the sigma method in inverse scattering to solve the problem (Cornean et al, 2006); Mueller and Siltanen (2020) At present, several common regularization algorithms can be divided into two categories according to different constraints. The regularization algorithms based on the L-2 norm include the Tikhonov regularization algorithm (Peng et al, 2007) and the noser regularization algorithm; the regularization algorithms based on the L-1 norm include the sparse regularization algorithm (Varanasi et al, 2019) and the TV (Total Variation) regularization algorithm (Fan, 2012).…”
Section: Inverse Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological tissues can also demonstrate inductive properties, but when compared to their resistance and reactance, inductance is very low at frequencies below 10MHz, therefore it can often be neglected ( 15 ). Thus, the complex electrical impedance produced by biological tissues which can also be called bioimpedance, is the result of contribution of both capacitance and conductance of the tissues which are both frequency-dependent ( 9 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ).…”
Section: Bioimpedance Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different approaches to local or limited data reconstruction have been reviewed in [19]- [21]. Work related to local Tomography has been generalized to different geometries [23], [24], as well as to emission [25], [26] and/or soft-field modalities [27].…”
Section: B Global Character (Non-locality) Of the Standard Fbpmentioning
confidence: 99%