2019
DOI: 10.1287/trsc.2018.0830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Logic-Based Benders Approach to Home Healthcare Delivery

Abstract: Please scroll down for article-it is on subsequent pages With 12,500 members from nearly 90 countries, INFORMS is the largest international association of operations research (O.R.) and analytics professionals and students. INFORMS provides unique networking and learning opportunities for individual professionals, and organizations of all types and sizes, to better understand and use O.R. and analytics tools and methods to transform strategic visions and achieve better outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…LBBD-MIP-OC denotes the LBBD method with sub-problems solved via MIP and optimality cut (26). LBBD-TS-GC means the LBBD method with sub-problems solved via TS and greedy assignment cut (27). LBBD-MIP-GC and LBBD-TS-OC have similar meanings.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…LBBD-MIP-OC denotes the LBBD method with sub-problems solved via MIP and optimality cut (26). LBBD-TS-GC means the LBBD method with sub-problems solved via TS and greedy assignment cut (27). LBBD-MIP-GC and LBBD-TS-OC have similar meanings.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constraint enforces the set of jobs assigned to the machine with the largest portion in the objective value that must remove a job in the next iteration. Although we considered the cut mentioned in Tadumadze et al [47] to change the set of jobs assigned to every machine by removing a job, the numerical test reports that it does not perform better than the greedy cut (27). We want to point out that constraint (27) does not warrant an optimal solution as it does not consider the impact on the objective function value by removing a job from other machines, which potentially can lead to a better job-to-machine assignment.…”
Section: Proposition 2 Constraint (26) Is a Valid Benders Optimality Cutmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We optimize the MP using a mathematical programming model (solved via CPLEX) and SPs using both mathematical (solved via CPLEX) and constraint (solved via CPOptimizer) programming model, and note that IP/CP decomposition methods are by far more popular than IP/IP decompositions (Fazel‐Zarandi and Beck 2012, Heching et al. 2019, Ku and Beck 2016, Ku et al. 2014, Roshanaei et al.…”
Section: Decomposition Alternatives: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a disconnect between the variables that the MP optimizes and those of SPs has been resolved by the concept of SP relaxation (Heching et al. 2019, Hooker 2007). (Remark 4 defines SP relaxation.)…”
Section: Decomposition Alternatives: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%