2008
DOI: 10.1094/pdis-92-1-0042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Logistic Regression Model for Predicting Risk of White Mold Incidence on Dry Bean in North Dakota

Abstract: White mold, caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, is the most important disease affecting dry bean production in North Dakota. This disease currently is managed mainly through fungicides applied during the flowering stage. A disease-forecasting model was developed to help growers with their decision to apply these fungicides. The model was built using weather variables collected during eight consecutive half-month periods between 1 May and 31 August 2003 to 2005 and white mold incidence data obtained from 150 fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Logistic regression has been extensively used in medicine, for example in clinical studies (Petrie and Sabin, 2000). However, in spite of its potential for many types of studies, its use is not generalized in plant epidemiology (Mila et al, 2003;Musaka et al, 2003;Weiland et al, 2003;Thebaud et al, 2006;Harikrishnan and Del Río, 2007). We have compared logistic regression with three functions frequently used in plant epidemiology: the logistic, Gompertz and log-logistic growth functions (Campbell and Madden, 1990;Jeger, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Logistic regression has been extensively used in medicine, for example in clinical studies (Petrie and Sabin, 2000). However, in spite of its potential for many types of studies, its use is not generalized in plant epidemiology (Mila et al, 2003;Musaka et al, 2003;Weiland et al, 2003;Thebaud et al, 2006;Harikrishnan and Del Río, 2007). We have compared logistic regression with three functions frequently used in plant epidemiology: the logistic, Gompertz and log-logistic growth functions (Campbell and Madden, 1990;Jeger, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, logistic regression should be a more general and better approach for fitting bivariate, binomially distributed variables, such as count data of disease infection. Whereas logistic regression has been extensively used in case-control analysis in clinical epidemiology (Petrie and Sabin, 2000;Agresti, 2002), it is infrequent in plant epidemiology studies (Mila et al, 2003;Musaka et al, 2003;Weiland et al, 2003;Thebaud et al, 2006;Harikrishnan and Del Río, 2007). In this paper, we discuss the results of fitting logistic, Gompertz and log-logistic models, or a logistic regression model, to data sets describing Alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV) infection in one to five years-aged lucerne fields in the Ebro Valley, Northeast Spain.…”
Section: Resumen Comparación De Modelos De Regresión Logística Y Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Once released, ascospores are viable for approximately 17 hours but, if conducive conditions are not present, host tissue infection will not occur. 23 Larger sclerotia produce greater numbers of apothecia and, thus, greater amounts of ascospores.…”
Section: Carpogenic Germinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,29 Mycelium is more tolerant to desiccation than ascospores and thus is more tolerant at lower RH. 7 Once infection has been initiated, S. sclerotiorum has the ability to remain inactive (latent) in host tissue in the absence of free moisture, resulting in delayed or arrested lesion development until favourable moisture levels re-occur. 30 It is evident that survival, inoculum production and infection of plants by S. sclerotiorum involves numerous stimuli and pathogen responses to weather conditions, agronomic activities and host growth stages during critical phases of pathogen survival and growth.…”
Section: Infection Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation