2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A long serendipitous XMM–Newton observation of the intermediate polar XY Ari1

Abstract: XY Ari is one of the few known eclipsing intermediate polars. We present results from a detailed analysis of an unpublished archival observation using XMM-Newton EPIC pn and MOS data in a quiescent state of XY Ari. The X-ray orbital modulation and spin pulse variations were investigated for energy dependent modulations in different energy bands. The broad orbital modulation observed with various observations was confirmed with XMM-Newton at hard X-ray (>1.6 keV). The EPIC light curves folded at the spin phases… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For CVs without NuSTAR observations, their T max are measured by fitting the 3-50 keV Suzaku spectra with the same model as for the NuSTAR spectra.The I 7.0 /I 6.7 values of individual CVs are adopted fromXu et al (2016) except XY Ari. The I 7.0 /I 6.7 of XY Ari is re-measured to be 0.94 ± 0.2, which is consistent with the recent XMM-Newton observations(Zengin Camurdan et al 2018), and is higher than the value (0.62 ± 0.10) obtained byXu et al (2016).…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…For CVs without NuSTAR observations, their T max are measured by fitting the 3-50 keV Suzaku spectra with the same model as for the NuSTAR spectra.The I 7.0 /I 6.7 values of individual CVs are adopted fromXu et al (2016) except XY Ari. The I 7.0 /I 6.7 of XY Ari is re-measured to be 0.94 ± 0.2, which is consistent with the recent XMM-Newton observations(Zengin Camurdan et al 2018), and is higher than the value (0.62 ± 0.10) obtained byXu et al (2016).…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…While it would be ideal to obtain the duration from a very large number of X-ray eclipse observations with higher time resolution, we consider that the eclipse length in Allan et al ( 1996 ) is accurate enough for our purposes. In fact, even if it were biased by ±50 s, which is comparable to the length of the X-ray eclipse ingress/egress (Kamata et al 1991 ;Hellier 1997 ;Zengin Ćamurdan et al 2018 ), we would obtain an inclination i = 80.2 • ± 0.5 • for a 2000 ± 28 s eclipse duration, and i = 81.6 • ± 0.5 • for 2100 ± 28 s. This change in the inclination would have a < 1 per cent effect on the dynamical masses, which illustrates the robustness of our results.…”
Section: Binary Mass Ratio Orbital Inclination and Stellar Massesmentioning
confidence: 97%