2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-10115-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A longitudinal analysis of the progression from normal blood pressure to stage 2 hypertension: A 12-year Korean cohort

Abstract: Background The study aimed to estimate the incidence of and period of progression to stage 2 hypertension from normal blood pressure. Methods We selected a total of 21,172 normotensive individuals between 2003 and 2004 from the National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening and followed them up until 2015. The criteria for blood pressure were based on the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2017 guideline (normal BP: SBP &… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aging has been reported to be positively associated with hypertension [36]. In this research, not only did we find a higher age in hypertension group, but we also found a lower HRQoL was associated with increasing age for patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Aging has been reported to be positively associated with hypertension [36]. In this research, not only did we find a higher age in hypertension group, but we also found a lower HRQoL was associated with increasing age for patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Aging has been reported to be positively associated with hypertension [32]. In this research, not only did we nd a higher age in hypertension group, but we also found a lower HRQoL was associated with increasing age for patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Studies have shown that the natural progression of HbA1c and blood pressure is to increase over time. [12][13][14][15] Investigators have also demonstrated that if participants remain in an intervention long term, clinical markers can remain stable. 23 For example, a 5-year study of 120 individuals randomized to group (intervention) or individual (control) diabetes care revealed that HbA1c levels remained stable for intervention but not control participants (intervention: 0.1%; control: 1.7%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11] The clinical outcomes achieved during TIME are important, but it is not known if these clinical outcomes would be sustainable over time or worsen as would be expected without an intervention. [12][13][14][15] In this study, we evaluated post-intervention data of TIME participants. Specifically, we recorded semiannual HbA1c (primary outcome), blood pressure, weight, and BMI data from baseline to 24 months to assess sustainability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%