2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A longitudinal cross-sectional analysis of substance use treatment trends for individuals experiencing homelessness, criminal justice involvement, both, or neither - United States, 2006-2018

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, TEDS-A includes data at the treatment admission rather than at the individual level so that individuals may be represented multiple times. In previous work, we have shown that limiting the sample to treatment admissions for individuals with no prior treatment does not substantially affect the results 40 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, TEDS-A includes data at the treatment admission rather than at the individual level so that individuals may be represented multiple times. In previous work, we have shown that limiting the sample to treatment admissions for individuals with no prior treatment does not substantially affect the results 40 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In previous work, we have shown that limiting the sample to admissions for individuals with no prior treatment does not substantially affect the results. 40 Previously identified limitations of each data source may affect interpretations of specific trends. Estimates from NSDUH likely understate the prevalence of less commonly used substances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also showed that low rates of MOUD among individuals experiencing CLI or housing instability were not only due to accessing different treatment settings, but lower odds of receiving MOUD. We build on previous research that describes treatment disparities at specialty substance use treatment facilities, by showing these inequities persist across multiple treatment settings ( Han et al., 2022 ; Shearer et al., 2022 ; Stahler et al., 2022 ). This could be due to factors such as prescribers’ perceptions of MOUD adherence and stigmatizing views of CLI and housing instability ( Howell et al., 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…At the intersection of CJS, substance use treatment, and social disadvantage, Han and colleagues [32 ▪▪ ] found that people experiencing homelessness and entering substance use treatment for OUD were less likely to receive MOUD if the CJS referred them. Yet, individuals involved in the CJS and experiencing homelessness had the highest admissions for concurrent heroin and methamphetamine use in 2018 [33 ▪▪ ]. Overall, Shearer and colleagues [33 ▪▪ ] found that 31% of substance use treatment admissions were those involved in the CJS; however, these admissions decreased from 2006 to 2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, individuals involved in the CJS and experiencing homelessness had the highest admissions for concurrent heroin and methamphetamine use in 2018 [33 ▪▪ ]. Overall, Shearer and colleagues [33 ▪▪ ] found that 31% of substance use treatment admissions were those involved in the CJS; however, these admissions decreased from 2006 to 2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%