2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2004.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A longitudinal evaluation of treatment engagement and recovery stages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
131
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
131
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…26,27 Based only on speculation, individuals on combination therapy for smoking cessation may have higher self-efficacy and motivation to quit, which in turn may be reflected in improved adherence. 28 Finally, a substantial limitation is that administrative claims data do not allow for valid and reliable assessment of clinical outcomes associated with smoking cessation treatment (i.e., tobacco abstinence). The relationship between varenicline OOP costs and medication adherence measured by PDC was modest, and the relationship between days' coverage with medication and tobacco cessation in the real-world setting has not been established.…”
Section: ■■ Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,27 Based only on speculation, individuals on combination therapy for smoking cessation may have higher self-efficacy and motivation to quit, which in turn may be reflected in improved adherence. 28 Finally, a substantial limitation is that administrative claims data do not allow for valid and reliable assessment of clinical outcomes associated with smoking cessation treatment (i.e., tobacco abstinence). The relationship between varenicline OOP costs and medication adherence measured by PDC was modest, and the relationship between days' coverage with medication and tobacco cessation in the real-world setting has not been established.…”
Section: ■■ Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Counselors are key players in both the delivery of treatment, especially in regard to their ability to affect client engagement (e.g., Barber et al, 2001;Joe, Simpson, Dansereau, & Rowan-Szal, 2001;Martin, Garske, & Davis, 2000;Simpson & Joe, 2004), and the transfer process of evidence-based interventions into clinical practice (e.g., Knudsen & Roman, 2004;Knudsen, Ducharme, Roman, & Link, 2005). Indeed, their views of the treatment program as a workplace and its social norms also are associated with the treatment experiences and progress of their clients (e.g., Broome et al, this issue;Moos & Moos, 1998), as well as their own job engagement and satisfaction (e.g., Maslach, Shaufeli, & Leiter, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few other variables that discriminated had smaller impact than these two treatment process measures. The utility of the recovery patterns in the current research suggest that the area of expectations might be viable as an indicator of treatment progress in addition to that of counseling rapport, whose usefulness has been demonstrated in modeling treatment process (e.g., Simpson & Joe, 2004) and in predicting follow-up outcomes (e.g., Joe et al, 2001). Even though rapport was a strong discriminator of the groups, expectations might be a useful separate indicator of treatment progress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%