2022
DOI: 10.1017/s0142716422000030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A longitudinal examination of French and English reading comprehension in French immersion programs in Canada

Abstract: Parental level of education, instruction time, and amount of language practice that children receive have enhanced our understanding of how bilingual and multilingual children learn to comprehend text. Guided by the simple view of reading and the interdependence hypothesis, this longitudinal study conducted in Canadian French immersion programs examined the (a) within- and cross-language association between oral language skills and reading comprehension of bilingual English–French and multilingual children and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(125 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found evidence of cross-linguistic association (r = .63) beween children's L1 vocabulary skills and their L2 RC, which may explain the stronger mean peformance on the latter task than on L2 word reading and pseudoword decoding, neither of which were strongly correlated with L1 vocabulary. Others have also reported correlation coefficients of a similar magnitude (r = .64) between an earlier version of the same measure in English (PPVT-III) and French RC in slightly older Canadian children (Grades 4 and 6) in FI (e.g., Bérubé et al, 2022). Our findings align with those of Bérubé's et al's as suggestive of linguistic interdependence across L1 language and L2 literacy (Cummins, 1991;Uchikoshi & Marinova-Todd, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found evidence of cross-linguistic association (r = .63) beween children's L1 vocabulary skills and their L2 RC, which may explain the stronger mean peformance on the latter task than on L2 word reading and pseudoword decoding, neither of which were strongly correlated with L1 vocabulary. Others have also reported correlation coefficients of a similar magnitude (r = .64) between an earlier version of the same measure in English (PPVT-III) and French RC in slightly older Canadian children (Grades 4 and 6) in FI (e.g., Bérubé et al, 2022). Our findings align with those of Bérubé's et al's as suggestive of linguistic interdependence across L1 language and L2 literacy (Cummins, 1991;Uchikoshi & Marinova-Todd, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Based on the hierarchical regression analyses and after controlling for the variance in word-level reading skills, WM and inhibition explained an additional 4.5% of the variance in RC and together the shifting measures explained an additional 16.5% of the variance in RC. That most of the variance in reading comprehenion was subsumed by children’s French L2 word level reading skills is unsurprising given the critical role that code related skills have in early reading development (García & Cain, 2014) and for children in the FI context (e.g., Bérubé et al, 2022). Inibition (i.e, stroop task) has been reported to contribute 5%−6% of variance to RC in younger (e.g., Conners, 2009) and older (e.g., Parker, 2022) children and our findings are consistent with these estimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%