2008
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A longitudinal investigation of psychological morbidity in patients with ovarian cancer

Abstract: Ovarian cancer patients may experience psychological disorders due to the aggressive nature of the illness and treatment. We investigated the presence of psychological disorders longitudinally in women with a new diagnosis of ovarian cancer and the factors that predicted development and maintenance of these disorders. Patients were assessed in a prospective longitudinal study at the beginning of chemotherapy treatment, mid-treatment, end of treatment and 3 months follow-up for depression, anxiety, perceived so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A strength of our study was the inclusion of repeated assessments and the inclusion of timevarying variables in the analyses, since the assumption that people's mood and coping style remain constant over the cancer trajectory is unsupported by the literature [38][39] Thus, use of baseline or cross-sectional assessment of psychosocial variables only, can represent a flaw in the study design. Our analyses using baseline variables only produced quite different findings to those including time varying variables, with optimism and minimization no longer significant in these models, reinforcing the importance of considering variables over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A strength of our study was the inclusion of repeated assessments and the inclusion of timevarying variables in the analyses, since the assumption that people's mood and coping style remain constant over the cancer trajectory is unsupported by the literature [38][39] Thus, use of baseline or cross-sectional assessment of psychosocial variables only, can represent a flaw in the study design. Our analyses using baseline variables only produced quite different findings to those including time varying variables, with optimism and minimization no longer significant in these models, reinforcing the importance of considering variables over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following example shows how to change the mental attitude approach to the disease, and thus the effects of treatment. Literature says that the strategies of adaptation to the disease and its acceptance play a key role in the process of treatment and recovery [1,2,9,12]. In health care for patients with cancer, healthcare professionals should therefore remember this important relationship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sick woman creates her own personal image of disease, ranging from diagnosis through the entire therapy. In the treatment process, it is important to learn how to function with the illness, how to attain the recovery and how to develop a style of coping with difficulties [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key risk factors for developing depression include, but are not limited to, a history of depression, lower levels of social support, advanced stages of illness, higher symptom burden, and more frequent unmet needs. 7,[9][10][11][12] Other predisposing risk factors include younger age, neurotic personality, and low education history; [12][13][14] however, these predisposing factors are unmodifiable, and, therefore, clinicians should focus on the modifiable key risk factors that are mentioned above.…”
Section: Prevalencementioning
confidence: 99%