A longitudinal, multicentre, cohort study of community rehabilitation service delivery in long-term neurological conditions

Abstract

ObjectivesPart A: To pilot the use of a register to identify and monitor patients with complex needs arising from long-term neurological conditions. Part B: To determine the extent to which patients’ needs for health and social services are met following discharge to the community after inpatient rehabilitation; to identify which factors predict unmet needs and to explore the relationship between service provision and outcomes at 12 months.DesignA multicentre, prospective, cohort study surveying participants at 1, 6 and 12 months using postal/online questionnaires and telephone interview.SettingConsecutive discharges to the community from all nine tertiary, specialist, inpatient neurorehabilitation services in London over 18 months in 2010–2011.ParticipantsOf 576 admissions 428 patients were recruited at discharge: 256 responded at 4 weeks, 212 at 6 months and 190 at 12 months.MeasuresNeurological Impairment Scale, The Needs and Provision Complexity Scale, The Northwick Park Dependency Scale, Community Integration Questionnaire, Zarit Burden Inventory.Resultsn=322 (75%) expressed willingness to be registered, but in practice less than half responded to questionnaires at 6 and 12 months (49% and 44%, respectively), despite extensive efforts to contact them, with no significant differences between responders and non-responders. Significant unmet needs were identified within the first year following discharge, particularly in rehabilitation, social work support and provision of specialist equipment. Dependency for basic care and motor and cognitive impairment predicted services received, together accounting for 40% of the variance. Contra to expectation, patients whose rehabilitation needs were met were more dependent and less well integrated at 12 months post discharge than those with unmet needs.ConclusionsRegistration is acceptable to most patients, but questionnaires/telephone interviews may not be the most efficient way to reach them. When community resources are limited, service provision tends to be focused on the most dependent patients.RegistrationThe study was registered with the NIHR Comprehensive Local Research Network: ID number 7503

Unmet needs for healthcare and social support services in patients with Huntington’s disease: a cross-sectional population-based study

“…Indeed, observations from clinical practice indicate that HD patients in later stages tend to have a higher caregiver frequency and are more often cared for outside the home. Our findings are also in line with research on patient with long-term neurological conditions reporting that patients whose rehabilitation needs were met were more dependent at 12 months after discharge from hospital than those with unmet needs [ 33 ]. Furthermore, studies identifying unmet needs after traumatic brain injury indicate that patients with more visible needs have a higher degreee of met needs, which may reflect that health professionals are working actively and responsibly for the patient; thus, the patients are more satisfied and perceive their needs as met [ 34 ].…”

Interaction effects of in-hospital rehabilitation and the use of community-based services after hospital discharge on patients’ subsequent functional abilities

“…A rehabilitation therapist can evaluate a patient's rehabilitation needs individually and deliver necessary interventions to the patient in the rehabilitation service. A British study reported that patients whose rehabilitation needs were unmet were more dependent and less integrated 1 year after hospital discharge than those whose rehabilitation needs were met (29). Thus, in the present study, the subsequent FIM score of stroke patients and other disease patients whose FIM change% were higher became larger when they received more community-based rehabilitation than when they received less community-based rehabilitation.…”

Cost-efficiency of specialist inpatient rehabilitation for working-aged adults with complex neurological disabilities: a multicentre cohort analysis of a national clinical data set

“…It does of course assume that the gains in independence are maintained. Evidence from a multicentre evaluation of community-based follow-up reported stability of dependency (and in some cases, further improvement) over the first year following discharge from the nine specialist levels 1 and 2a rehabilitation services in London, 30 suggesting that this assumption is valid—and possibly even conservative—on a population basis.…”