2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A longitudinal study of changes in psychosocial well-being during orthognathic treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
13

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
35
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…As described by Albrecht & Devlieger , in what they term ‘the disability paradox’, many patients living with chronic conditions report that their overall quality of life and well‐being is good, despite their functional limitations. Consistent with this, a recent longitudinal study of changes in well‐being before, during, and up to 1 yr after orthognathic surgery found no changes in patients’ daily affect (including annoyance/irritation, worry, sadness/depression, feeling tired, feeling hurried, and happiness/satisfaction) from pretreatment to 1 yr after surgery . Hence, despite the prevalence of research demonstrating positive changes in patients perceptions of the extent to which their oral health impacts upon their psychosocial functioning, there is a alack of evidence for an impact of orthognathic surgery on patients’ general wellbeing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As described by Albrecht & Devlieger , in what they term ‘the disability paradox’, many patients living with chronic conditions report that their overall quality of life and well‐being is good, despite their functional limitations. Consistent with this, a recent longitudinal study of changes in well‐being before, during, and up to 1 yr after orthognathic surgery found no changes in patients’ daily affect (including annoyance/irritation, worry, sadness/depression, feeling tired, feeling hurried, and happiness/satisfaction) from pretreatment to 1 yr after surgery . Hence, despite the prevalence of research demonstrating positive changes in patients perceptions of the extent to which their oral health impacts upon their psychosocial functioning, there is a alack of evidence for an impact of orthognathic surgery on patients’ general wellbeing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Immediately following orthognathic surgery, a patient's natural frame of reference is their presurgery facial aesthetics and oral function. Therefore, not surprisingly, patients who have undergone orthognathic surgery report feeling happier and more satisfied with their facial aesthetics, social functioning, and overall quality of life up to 12 months following surgery . For as long as patients use their presurgery facial aesthetics and functioning (oral and social) as the comparison standard against which to evaluate their current (post‐surgery) circumstances, they may continue to derive happiness and satisfaction from this aspect of their lives (assuming that they are also paying attention to it).…”
Section: Pathways To Hedonic Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esta escala tem sido bastante utilizada nas pesquisas para avaliar as relações da imagem corporal e a autoestima (Kater et al, 2002;Koyuncu et al, 2010;Pisitsungkagarn et al, 2014). Mais recentemente as influências psicológicas da maloclusão e do tratamento ortodôntico-cirúrgico sobre a autoestima mostram que pacientes que concluíram o tratamento ortodôntico (Jung, 2010;Johal et al, 2015) e o tratamento ortodôntico-cirúrgico apresentavam um aumento na autoestima (Alanko et al, 2014;Jung, 2016;Alanko et al, 2017).…”
Section: Pacientes Com Deformidade Dento-facial E Autoestimaunclassified
“…Os benefícios da cirurgia ortognática incluem a melhora significativa da função mastigatória, deglutição e fonação, a melhora da estética facial e autoimagem, o que pode influenciar positivamente na autoestima e qualidade de vida (Murphy et al, 2011;Jung, 2016;Alanko et al, 2017;Tamme et al, 2017;Chaurasia et al, 2018). 22 afirmações onde cada item é classificado em uma escala de quatro pontos com respostas que variam de 0= "não me incomoda ou não se aplica a mim" a 4= "me incomoda muito" (Cunningham et al, 2000a;Cunningham et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation