1990
DOI: 10.1080/03634529009378783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A longitudinal study of college students’ communication competence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
45
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…All reviewers made a comment to this effect, during or at the conclusion of the videotaped presentation evaluation sessions; and/or 4. The Athletes for Outreach program study may be similar to findings of the Rubin, Graham, and Mignerey (1990) study of college students' communication competence, in that significant skill improvement may be latent (e.g., significant improvement may not be recognized for one to two years after instruction).…”
Section: Findings and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All reviewers made a comment to this effect, during or at the conclusion of the videotaped presentation evaluation sessions; and/or 4. The Athletes for Outreach program study may be similar to findings of the Rubin, Graham, and Mignerey (1990) study of college students' communication competence, in that significant skill improvement may be latent (e.g., significant improvement may not be recognized for one to two years after instruction).…”
Section: Findings and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Several statistically significant positive correlations however were found between communication competence and the number of speeches given with respect to both individual competencies and the overall performance score on the "Competent Speaker" Form. Rubin, Graham, and Mignerey (1990) noted that the environment, education, experiences, communication partners, and perceived expectations of the situation can all affect perceptions of communication competence. While recruitment was the goal of the training presentations, the demonstration presentations were often not focused or goal oriented.…”
Section: Findings and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PRCA-24 was designed to assess feelings about communicating in four contexts (six questions per context): group discussion, meetings, dyad, and public speaking. These four contexts have been consistently reported as being extracted as four distinct dimensions in US samples (Ayers, 1988;Richmond & McCroskey, 1995;Rubin, Graham, & Mignerey, 1990). Scores on the PRCA-24 can range from a minimum of 24 to a maximum of 120.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alpha reliability estimates for all 24 items range from 0.93 to 0.95 [14]. The instrument also demonstrates considerable stability across time; test-retest reliability coefficients greater than .80 have been reported [15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Alpha reliability estimates for all 24 items range from 0.93 to 0.95 [14]. The instrument also demonstrates considerable stability across time; test-retest reliability coefficients greater than .80 have been reported [15].The Personal Report of CA-24 (24 items) is structured in four groups of statements each: Statements 1 to 6 are related to oral communication in groups; Statements 7 to 12 are related to oral communication in meetings (or classes); Statements 13 to 18 are related to oral communication in dyads (couples); and Statements 19 to 24 are related to oral communication in public speaking [11].Meanwhile, the level of English oral communication apprehensions of the teacher education students was based on the PRCA-24 results. The five responses were given numerical equivalents as: Strongly Agree (1); Agree (2); Undecided (3); Disagree (4); and Strongly Disagree (5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%