A Longitudinal Study of Invention and Understanding in Children's Multidigit Addition and Subtraction

Abstract

This 3-year longitudinal study investigated the development of 82 children's understanding of multidigit number concepts and operations in Grades 1-3. Students were individually interviewed 5 times on a variety of tasks involving base-ten number concepts and addition and subtraction problems. The study provides an existence proof that children can invent strategies for adding and subtracting and illustrates both what that invention affords and the role that different concepts may play in that invention. About 90% of the students used invented strategies. Students who used invented strategies before they learned standard algorithms demonstrated better knowledge of base-ten number concepts and were more successful in extending their knowledge to new situations than were students who initially learned standard algorithms. An understanding of most fundamental mathematics concepts and skills develops over an extended period of time. Although cross-sectional studies can provide snapshots of the development of these concepts at particular points in time, longitudinal studies provide a more complete perspective; however, relatively few studies have traced the development of fundamental mathematics concepts in children over more than a single year. In this paper we report the results of a 3-year longitudinal study of the growth of children's-understanding of addition and subtraction involving multidigit numbers. We focus particularly on children's construction of invented strategies for adding and subtracting multidigit numbers. The overarching goal of the study was to investigate the role that invented strategies may play in developing an understanding of multidigit addition and subtraction concepts and procedures. We trace the development and use of invented addition and subtraction strategies and examine the relation of these strategies to the development of fundamental knowledge of base-ten number concepts and the use of standard addition and subtraction algorithms. Finally, we consider what the use of invented strategies affords by way of avoiding systematic errors and extending knowledge of basic multidigit operations to new problem situations. BACKGROUND There is mounting evidence that children both in and out of school can construct methods for adding and subtracting multidigit numbers without explicit instruction in specific procedures (

The role of prior knowledge in the development of strategy flexibility: the case of computational estimation

“…Knowledge of multiple strategies has clear benefits for learning and performance; for example, learners with knowledge of multiple Prior knowledge and flexibility 5 strategies at pretest are more likely to learn from instructional interventions (Alibali, 1999;Siegler, 1995). In general, and across multiple domains (including elementary mathematics), the benefits of multiple strategies are well documented (Alibali, 1999;Carpenter, Franke, Jacobs, Fennema, & Empson, 1998;Dowker, 1998 Knowledge of strategy efficiency is a fundamental feature of problem-solving expertise and is also a fundamental mechanism supporting learning and development (Siegler, 1996). For example, Blöte and colleagues have found that more skilled students know and select mental addition strategies that most closely match the characteristics of numbers in the problem, because such a matching approach allowed students to solve the problem using the fewest number of steps (Blöte, Klein, & Beishuizen, 2000;Blöte et al, 2001).…”

“…Knowledge of multiple strategies has clear benefits for learning and performance; for example, learners with knowledge of multiple Prior knowledge and flexibility 5 strategies at pretest are more likely to learn from instructional interventions (Alibali, 1999;Siegler, 1995). In general, and across multiple domains (including elementary mathematics), the benefits of multiple strategies are well documented (Alibali, 1999;Carpenter, Franke, Jacobs, Fennema, & Empson, 1998;Dowker, 1998;LeFevre, Smith-Chant, Hiscock, Daley, & Morris, 2003;Resnick & Ford, 1981;Rittle-Johnson & Star, 2007;Star & Rittle-Johnson, 2008, in press;Star & Seifert, 2006).…”

Modeling Strategy Use in an Intelligent Tutoring System: Implications for Strategic Flexibility

“…The ability to flexibly solve math problems is a valued measure of proficiency and important to future learning [5,8]. Few studies have investigated how strategic flexibility is displayed in ITSs, and perhaps as a result no studies have directly measured math flexibility using an ITS.…”

“…Schneider et al [2] found a bidirectional relationship between procedural and conceptual knowledge and hypothesized that these two types of knowledge improve strategic flexibility in an iterative fashion. Students who have high strategic flexibility are more likely to adapt their strategies, transferring their knowledge to solve new problems [8,4]. Conversely, students who lack strategic flexibility struggle to solve more difficult or unfamiliar problems that require the use of different strategies [6].…”

Views of Struggling Students on Instruction Incorporating Multiple Strategies in Algebra I: An Exploratory Study

“…These four features of multiple-strategy instruction, along with the two types of instructional goals, emerged from research around the learning and teaching of mathematics in elementary school, particularly the work of the Cognitively Guided Instruction (CGI) project (e.g. Carpenter, Franke, Jacobs, Fennema, & Empson, 1998) combined with an emphasis on the use of multiple representations in algebra (e.g., Brenner et al, 1997;Star & Rittle-Johnson, 2009b).…”