2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A longitudinal study of risk factors for teat lesions in 67 suckler ewes in a single flock in England

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In beef cows, reasons for teat injuries are less well documented but traumatic causes are also likely. An observational study by Cooper et al ( 18 ) described risk factors for traumatic and non-traumatic lesions in a flock of suckler ewes. Huntley et al ( 19 ) demonstrated that teat injuries have a significant negative impact on the daily weight gain of suckler lambs, but this cannot be extrapolated to include suckler cows.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In beef cows, reasons for teat injuries are less well documented but traumatic causes are also likely. An observational study by Cooper et al ( 18 ) described risk factors for traumatic and non-traumatic lesions in a flock of suckler ewes. Huntley et al ( 19 ) demonstrated that teat injuries have a significant negative impact on the daily weight gain of suckler lambs, but this cannot be extrapolated to include suckler cows.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These farmer behaviours indicate that there is likely to be under-reporting of mild cases of mastitis and other time varying factors associated with mastitis. For example, teat lesions are relatively transient in nature ( Cooper et al, 2013 ) compared with udder conformation that is less changeable over time and the irregularity of farmer checks coupled with the transient nature of teat lesions might have resulted in an under-estimation of teat lesions, and therefore an inaccurate identification of a lack of association with flock mean IRCM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Palpable masses in the udder were defined as IMM and recorded as present or absent. Teat lesions were defined as any lesion present on the teat including bites, tears, grazes, spots, warts and proliferative scabs (Cooper et al, 2013) and were also recorded as present or absent.…”
Section: Data Collected On Udder and Teat Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Casu et al, 2010, de la Fuenta et al, 2011, Fernandez et al, 1997, Legarra and Ugarte, 2005, Makovický et al, 2015, where udder and teat traits were heritable and genetically correlated with somatic cell count (SCC) or somatic cell score. In crossbred suckler ewes, udder and teat phenotype are associated with raised SCC, indicative of subclinical mastitis (Huntley et al, 2012), and traumatic teat lesions (Cooper et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%