1988
DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(88)90011-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A longitudinal study of short latency somatosensory evoked responses in healthy newborns and infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some previous neonatal SEP studies seemingly disagree with the MEG data by reporting an “adult-like” initial parietal negativity followed by a positivity in the same area with only slightly prolonged latencies (Willis et al, 1984; Laureau et al, 1988; George and Taylor, 1991). This may, however, be an artificial effect of the highpass filter setting applied in these studies (see Pihko and Lauronen, 2004).…”
Section: Normal Development Of the Somatosensory Systemmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some previous neonatal SEP studies seemingly disagree with the MEG data by reporting an “adult-like” initial parietal negativity followed by a positivity in the same area with only slightly prolonged latencies (Willis et al, 1984; Laureau et al, 1988; George and Taylor, 1991). This may, however, be an artificial effect of the highpass filter setting applied in these studies (see Pihko and Lauronen, 2004).…”
Section: Normal Development Of the Somatosensory Systemmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…With increasing gestational age, the amplitude of this slow wave gradually decreases and an earlier component, usually referred to as N1 in the literature, becomes detectable with a latency of approximately 90 ms somewhere between the 27th (Taylor et al, 1996) and 29th GW (Hrbek et al, 1973). Toward term-age, the N1 latency rapidly decreases (Hrbek et al, 1973; Klimach and Cooke, 1988a; Karniski et al, 1992; Taylor et al, 1996; Smit et al, 2000), reaching approximately 30 ms at term-age (sep MN 30), though with considerable inter-individual variability (Desmedt and Manil, 1970; Hrbek et al, 1973; Laget et al, 1976; Zhu et al, 1987; Laureau et al, 1988; Laureau and Marlot, 1990; George and Taylor, 1991; Gibson et al, 1992; Karniski, 1992). …”
Section: Normal Development Of the Somatosensory Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P15 is the first consistent wave form observed in scalp recordings. It is generated between the medulla and the thalamus in the medial lemniscus or in the ventroposterolateral nucleus of the thalamus [16,17]. N20 is a cortical response generated in the posterior wall of the central sulcus, and P22 is also cortical, generated in the crown of the posterior central sulcus [16,18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, controversy exists surrounding the interpretation of the SEP waveform. However, they are weil tolerated by children and the waveforms obtained are easily reproduceable due to minimal artifact present (Fagan et al, 1987, Laureau et al, 1988.…”
Section: Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (Sep)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predictive accuracy was greatest in severe cases and least in children with minimal involvement. However, for this study long latency SEP were analyzed which are not as clinically useful as short latency SEP, due to their greater inter-and intra-subject variability (Cracco et al, 1979), and are more affected by state of consciousness (Laureau et al, 1988). ln summary, many studies have shown SEP to be strongly correlated with sensory deficits (Giblin, 1964;Karnaze et al, 1987;Larson et al, 1966;Libersan, 1966;Maugiere et al 1983;Williamson et al, 1970;Wang et al, 1982;Zeman and Yiannikas, 1989) However several of these studies have inadequate descriptions of the methodology used and statistical analysis are not always ngldly applied.…”
Section: Clinical Sensory Testing Ln Cerebral Paisymentioning
confidence: 99%