2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A longitudinal study of state government homepage accessibility in Maryland and the role of web page templates for improving accessibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Part of the problem is a lack of exposure to accessibility during training [13,25,47]. Most web designers and developers have little or no experience to ensure that their code meets accessibility requirements.…”
Section: ) Lack Of Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Part of the problem is a lack of exposure to accessibility during training [13,25,47]. Most web designers and developers have little or no experience to ensure that their code meets accessibility requirements.…”
Section: ) Lack Of Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,25,47]. There is not much information about the difficulties that evaluators may face when assessing accessibility using these tools [35].…”
Section: ) Automated Testing Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, web accessibility has been evaluated over time. A longitudinal study of state government homepage accessibility in Maryland indicated that there were slight improvements in accessibility from 2009 to 2012 [13]. Another study found that the average accessibility level of social work education websites increased significantly from 2003 to 2008 [14].…”
Section: Web Accessibility Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have discussed the accessibility issue on websites in general (including libraries) (Brobst, 2009;Byerley & Chambers, 2002;Curl & Bowers, 2009;Farrelly, 2011;Green & Huprich, 2009;Lazar et al, 2012;Lilly & Fleet, 2000;Mates, 2004;Providenti & Zai, 2007b;Schmetzke & Comeaux, 2009;Wentz, Cirba, Kharal, Moran, & Slate, 2012;Yu & Lau, 2006), or on government websites (Abu-Doush, Bany-Mohammed, Ali, & Al-Betar, 2013;Brobst, 2012;Jaeger, 2004Jaeger, , 2006Jaeger, , 2008Jaeger & Matteson, 2009;Jaeger et al, 2013;Lazar et al, 2013). According to previous studies done about a decade ago, there are several critical barriers to compliance with Web accessibility: budget constraints, lacks of perception, skills, and knowledge, and absence of authoritative guidelines (Brophy & Craven, 2007, as cited in Disability Rights Commission (United Kingdom), 2004.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%