2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A longitudinal study of the role of vocabulary size in priming effects in early childhood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While proportions are commonly used in the LWL task at a young age (Lany, Giglio, & Oswalt, 2018), given that the RTs on the LWL task decrease with age (Donnelly & Kidd, 2020; Fernald et al., 1998; Fernald et al., 2006), proportions may become less reliable as they are affected by where the participant looks after fixating on the target word. This is consistent with the fact that Mani and Plunkett (2011) and Angulo‐Chavira and Arias‐Trejo (2018) found that phonological primes had the opposite effect on the proportion of looks to target in a preferential looking task (see also Avila‐Varela et al., 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While proportions are commonly used in the LWL task at a young age (Lany, Giglio, & Oswalt, 2018), given that the RTs on the LWL task decrease with age (Donnelly & Kidd, 2020; Fernald et al., 1998; Fernald et al., 2006), proportions may become less reliable as they are affected by where the participant looks after fixating on the target word. This is consistent with the fact that Mani and Plunkett (2011) and Angulo‐Chavira and Arias‐Trejo (2018) found that phonological primes had the opposite effect on the proportion of looks to target in a preferential looking task (see also Avila‐Varela et al., 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…While this is common for infant preferential‐looking data, it does not directly reflect the relevant metric–the speed with which children recognize the target word. Other research suggests the interpretation of this dependent variable may not always be clear: While Mani and Plunkett (2011) found that phonological primes decreased looks to target among 24‐month‐olds, which they attribute to activation of the target's number of onset neighbors, Angulo‐Chavira and Arias‐Trejo (2018) found that a variation of phonological priming increased the proportion of looks to target amongst 30‐month‐olds, the opposite pattern of results from Mani and Plunkett (see Avila‐Varela, Arias‐Trerjo & Mani, 2021, for a similar result with children aged 18 to 24 months) 1 . Third, while Mani and Plunkett (2011) argue that differences between 18‐ and 24‐month‐olds likely reflect different vocabulary sizes of the two groups, this assumes that age is a proxy for vocabulary and not other relevant variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e semantic subscale of incense burners in Ming and Qing dynasties mainly selected images first and used Likert 5point and other scales for evaluation. e evaluation scale consists of pairs of adjectives (Table 1) [28].…”
Section: Research Methods and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most important milestones of the first years of life is learning language, beginning with vocabulary ( Samuelsson, 2021 ). Knowing more words in early childhood facilitates further vocabulary and language development, a virtuous cycle ( Peter et al, 2020 ; Avila-Varela et al, 2021 ). Children with more vocabulary knowledge have, both immediately and over time, greater success in reading and other content areas ( Dickinson et al, 2010 ; Cristofaro and Tamis-LeMonda, 2012 ; Morgan et al, 2015 ), better-adjusted social interactions, and more self-regulation and executive functioning ( Winsler, 2009 ; Manning et al, 2019 ; Rantalainen et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Vocabulary Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%