2011
DOI: 10.1080/14330237.2011.10820460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Longitudinal Study of the Role of Trust During Change

Abstract: The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may also be argued that the measure of trust of employees in their leader could have a buffering consequence, as when employees have belief in their leader's judgment and good intentions, they may experience less uncertainty during times of change (Gundhus, 2018). Since trust can serve as lubrication for social systems, it may imply that employees can rely on the promises of others within their organization (Martins and von der Ohe, 2011). Werbel and Henriques (2009) state that trust is "the willingness to make oneself vulnerable to another person despite uncertainty regarding motive and prospective actions" (p. 781), implying that peril, exposure, and doubt are part of trustful relationships (Heyns and Rothmann, 2015).…”
Section: Precariousnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may also be argued that the measure of trust of employees in their leader could have a buffering consequence, as when employees have belief in their leader's judgment and good intentions, they may experience less uncertainty during times of change (Gundhus, 2018). Since trust can serve as lubrication for social systems, it may imply that employees can rely on the promises of others within their organization (Martins and von der Ohe, 2011). Werbel and Henriques (2009) state that trust is "the willingness to make oneself vulnerable to another person despite uncertainty regarding motive and prospective actions" (p. 781), implying that peril, exposure, and doubt are part of trustful relationships (Heyns and Rothmann, 2015).…”
Section: Precariousnessmentioning
confidence: 99%