1979
DOI: 10.1016/0029-5493(79)90139-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A look at alternative core-disruptive accidents in LMFBRs — Part II: Neutronic and fuel element behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27 The latter figure corresponds to reactor compaction of fuel to fill all the void spaces. 28 A suggested rule of thumb is that a collapse velocity in cm/s is equivalent to the corresponding insertion rate in $/s. As presented in Appendix 1, a simplified calculation of the PFBR collapse lasts for 280 microseconds.…”
Section: Reactivity Insertion Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 The latter figure corresponds to reactor compaction of fuel to fill all the void spaces. 28 A suggested rule of thumb is that a collapse velocity in cm/s is equivalent to the corresponding insertion rate in $/s. As presented in Appendix 1, a simplified calculation of the PFBR collapse lasts for 280 microseconds.…”
Section: Reactivity Insertion Ratementioning
confidence: 99%