Despite being the more accurate method to design earthquake-resistant buildings, the non-linear dynamic analysis still remains the least used in practice. The paper shows that some code inadequacies may even contribute to ward off the designer from this kind of seismic analysis. To this purpose, non-linear analyses under different sets of spectrum-compatible earthquakes and by considering two distinct plastic-hinge models were carried out for a multistory reinforced concrete (r/c) frame designed according to the Eurocode 8 provisions. It has been shown that owing to the inadequate limits imposed to the spectrum-compatible earthquakes, the European codes of practice may lead to significant inconsistencies in the seismic design of structures through the time-history non-linear analysis. Keywords: earthquake-resistant buildings, EC8 inadequacies, spectrum-compatible earthquakes, time-history non-linear seismic analysis.
INTRODUCTIONThe seismic design philosophy typically requires that buildings may withstand events of moderate severity deforming in the elastic range, without suffering any irreversible structural damage. Conversely, during strong earthquakes structures are required to behave in a dissipative ductile way, even getting damaged severely but without collapsing. These achievements have to be reached regardless to which type of code-based analysis (linear or non-linear) is chosen. If a linear analysis is performed, in fact, a reduced response spectrum can be adopted to design the structure so as it can withstand moderate earthquakes in the elastic range, while compliance with the detailed code provisions (local ductility and strength hierarchy rules) ensure that the plastic deformation capacity of the system can satisfy the demand under stronger earthquakes. If a non-linear analysis is carried out instead, the elastic and postelastic behaviour of the structure can be straight monitored. Both a non-linear static analysis (often referred to as 'pushover') and a non-linear time-history analysis (NLTHA) are allowed by codes. The latter is expected to be the more powerful since it obtains the deformation time-history of the system through a numerical integration of the differential equations of motion under the considered earthquake.Despite its indubitable potentials, the NLTHA is still the least applied method of seismic analysis. This may be due to the difficulties that even an experienced designer has to overcome when (i) modelling the non-linear behaviour of the system, (ii) defining the suite of spectrum-compatible earthquakes, (iii) carrying out the numerical calculations and even (iv) interpreting the results and choosing the requirements to be met. To help the designer, some codes of practice, i.e. FEMA-356 [1] and ATC-40 [2], give default properties for r/c plastic hinges, which are implemented by finite element structural programs such as SAP2000 [3]. User-friendly software tools, as for instance REXEL [4], are also available to obtain code-based selections of accelerograms.Nevertheless, the ...