1978
DOI: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1978.tb02198.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Loss Model for Parabolic-Profile Fiber Splices

Abstract: In the past, measurement results of splice loss of optical fibers have corresponded poorly to existing theory, which assumes a uniform power distribution across the cone of radiation defined by the local numerical aperture. In this paper, a model is developed in which a Gaussian power distribution across the local numerical aperture is assumed. Transmission through a splice at each point on the transmitting core is found to depend on the ratio of receiving to transmitting numerical aperture at that point. Nume… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Uniform-power distribution results do not agree with realistic splice loss measurements," Figure 2 demonstrates 1088 versus transverse offset for several power distributions, the Gaussian splice 1088 model, 2 and experimental data," The experimental data shown were obtained using 0.82-p.m laser excitation of a 7-km input fiber containing about 14 splices into a final splice that was offset in both x andy orthogonal axes. The offset data are in good agreement with previous data and should represent a realistic "steady-state" condition.…”
Section: Splice Lossmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Uniform-power distribution results do not agree with realistic splice loss measurements," Figure 2 demonstrates 1088 versus transverse offset for several power distributions, the Gaussian splice 1088 model, 2 and experimental data," The experimental data shown were obtained using 0.82-p.m laser excitation of a 7-km input fiber containing about 14 splices into a final splice that was offset in both x andy orthogonal axes. The offset data are in good agreement with previous data and should represent a realistic "steady-state" condition.…”
Section: Splice Lossmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…(1) can still be expressed byeq. (2) for both fibers. However, the radial and azimuthal variations of the receiving fiber (rR, q,R) need to be expressed in terms of the transmitting fiber (rT, q,) and the transverse offset, r», of the axes.…”
Section: A2 Rrnsverse Offset-identigii Fibersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…2 This model assumes that a steady-state power distribution (after a long length of fiber) can be modeled as a Gaussian distribution of the power within the solid angle defined by the local numerical aperture, NA, at any point on the fiber core ( Fig. 1).…”
Section: Theoretical Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of a phenomenological Gaussian point loss model 2 allows an approximate analytic treatment of the loss induced by a butt-joint splice between fibers which differ in one or more intrinsic parameters. Previous models based on the uniform power distribution assumption 1 have exhibited only limited agreement between calculated and measured splice loss, 3,4 whereas the Gaussian model gives good agreement with experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of simplified analytical models for evaluation of the excess loss of step-index multimode fiber splices have been proposed in the past. [9][10][11] However, because of the complexity of the MPD, only two specific MPD's, namely a uniform MPD and a steady or equilibrium MPD, typically are considered in these models. The model in which a uniform MPD is assumed has a very simple expression.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%