2002
DOI: 10.1080/713604550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Lost Opportunity? A Critique of the EU's Human Rights Policy Towards Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The power of the military to play a civil role and to intervene in political life through the National Security Council derives from the Turkish Constitution. 69 The European Commission has repeatedly opposed the active presence of the military in Turkish politics and cites it as firm evidence that the development of democracy at present falls short of EU standards. 70 Markedly, reforms that concern the issues of human rights and democracy are unlikely to meet with success, as long as the role of the military remains central to Turkish politics whenever deemed necessary.…”
Section: The Kurdish Issue and The Military's Role In Turkish Politicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The power of the military to play a civil role and to intervene in political life through the National Security Council derives from the Turkish Constitution. 69 The European Commission has repeatedly opposed the active presence of the military in Turkish politics and cites it as firm evidence that the development of democracy at present falls short of EU standards. 70 Markedly, reforms that concern the issues of human rights and democracy are unlikely to meet with success, as long as the role of the military remains central to Turkish politics whenever deemed necessary.…”
Section: The Kurdish Issue and The Military's Role In Turkish Politicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…41 However, Europe's decision has been characterised by some as part of the 'containment' policy that requires closer relations with Ankara, while delaying the prospect of membership. 42 During all these years, the EU did not seem to have the political will to incorporate Turkey; nonetheless, since rejecting Turkey outright would have been too costly in security terms, it found 'a perfect middle ground by neither completely closing the door to Turkey nor opening accession negotiations'. 43 Following Turkey's application for membership with the Community, the government in Ankara became more vulnerable and more responsive to European influence.…”
Section: Beyond the Copenhagen Criteriamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is no coincidence that Kemal Atatürk, founder of the Turkish Republic, came from the ranks of Turkey's military, as have five more presidents of the Turkish Republic. The Turkish military establishment's institutionalization has been cemented over time through the National Security Council (NSC), often perceived as the absolute champion of Kemalist legacy (Arikan 2002). More precisely, 'The Turkish military wields the bulk of its political influence through the NSC, the vehicle used in Turkey to determine foreign policy.…”
Section: The Military Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Helsinki has also promoted debate among the Turkish public on the conditions for EU membership, a debate which is supported and encouraged by the forces for reform in Turkey. 40 However, without a consensus among the political elites on the necessity and primacy of democratization, it is questionable that the Helsinki decision would have had the same effect on political elite discourses and on policies in Turkey.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Changes In Political Elite Discoursesmentioning
confidence: 99%