2023
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/mh8dq
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A low-carbon future? Individuals with high socioeconomic status in the UK show little willingness to change high-carbon lifestyles for climate change mitigation

Sophie Duncan,
Annika Hjelmskog,
Esther K. Papies

Abstract: Changing high-carbon lifestyles of individuals with high socioeconomic status (SES) is an important step toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions and ensuring social justice within climate mitigation. However, many high-carbon behaviours (such as frequent flying and car ownership) are also used to signal status within individuals’ social networks. Shifting consumption levels within high status individuals therefore may present a challenge, especially when individuals believe that engaging in high-carbon lifest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 73 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, by outsourcing control, responsibility is placed on external forces to regulate behaviour [91] and to determine the extent that personal "sacrifice" is required. Whilst the possibility of policy support may be promising for governments concerned about public perceptions of stricter regulation [92], future research should examine the types of behaviours that individuals desire to be enforced and the extent that individuals understand the personal implications of adherence; in other words, whether individuals would accept the possibility of policy that may indeed impede their personal choices or behaviour [54,93,94].…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, by outsourcing control, responsibility is placed on external forces to regulate behaviour [91] and to determine the extent that personal "sacrifice" is required. Whilst the possibility of policy support may be promising for governments concerned about public perceptions of stricter regulation [92], future research should examine the types of behaviours that individuals desire to be enforced and the extent that individuals understand the personal implications of adherence; in other words, whether individuals would accept the possibility of policy that may indeed impede their personal choices or behaviour [54,93,94].…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%