Proceedings. 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37252)
DOI: 10.1109/isit.2001.936173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A low complexity algorithm for the construction of algebraic geometric codes better than the Gilbert-Varshamov bound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
72
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
72
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In [3,5,6] polynomial-time algorithms are given for some specific towers. We believe that it is possible to provide such a polynomial time algorithm also for the tower T , and hence to obtain an explicit construction of the codes C i in polynomial time.…”
Section: Remark A19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [3,5,6] polynomial-time algorithms are given for some specific towers. We believe that it is possible to provide such a polynomial time algorithm also for the tower T , and hence to obtain an explicit construction of the codes C i in polynomial time.…”
Section: Remark A19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an important goal to improve the list size to a constant independent of n. The dependence of the list size on n in [4] arises because Reed-Solomon codes need an alphabet of size at least n. This motivates one to generalize this approach to AG codes which can have arbitrary block lengths over fixed alphabets, and also have very nice algebraic properties. Recent advances have greatly improved the efficiency and explicitness of constructions of AG codes [12], making this a promising route to approach capacity with better list size and decoding complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [12], a polynomial time algorithm is presented to compute the generator matrix of such an AG code. All we need to add to this to achieve the representation needed in Section 5.3 are the evaluations of the basis elements at some place R of a specified large degree, and the evaluations of 2g extra functions at the code places P 1 , P 2 , .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But there are two more recent methods [16] and [10] using methods which start with a module containing the integral closure and delete elements not in the integral closure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%