2009
DOI: 10.1109/lsp.2009.2022145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Low-Complexity Kalman Approach for Channel Estimation in Doubly-Selective OFDM Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maximum of the Doppler shift is set to 178 Hz (correspond to the subway train speed of 80 km / h). The pilot spacing meets the sampling law as follow: (8) The worst BER performance of the LS algorithm can be seen from Figure 4, while the BER performance of the LMMSE algorithm is followed. When the pilot interval is 4(in accordance with the sampling law), its BER performance of the L-ELM algorithm is little difference from the LMMSE algorithm, but when pilot interval is 8 (violation sampling law), its performance was significantly better than the previous two algorithms especially with the SNR increase.…”
Section: Simulation Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Maximum of the Doppler shift is set to 178 Hz (correspond to the subway train speed of 80 km / h). The pilot spacing meets the sampling law as follow: (8) The worst BER performance of the LS algorithm can be seen from Figure 4, while the BER performance of the LMMSE algorithm is followed. When the pilot interval is 4(in accordance with the sampling law), its BER performance of the L-ELM algorithm is little difference from the LMMSE algorithm, but when pilot interval is 8 (violation sampling law), its performance was significantly better than the previous two algorithms especially with the SNR increase.…”
Section: Simulation Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The channel estimation algorithm utilizes the SVM algorithm, which has heightened computation complexity [6][7]. In addition, the optimal channel estimation for OFDM system is using MMSE criterion [8].While following the guidelines of the estimation algorithm, the biggest drawback is the heightened computation complexity, so the low rank estimation attracts much attention because it can obtain higher performance in the case of reduced computation complexity. Through the determination of the signal subspace dimension and then obtaining the compromise between the computational complexity and estimated performance, that in the case of the estimation performance unchanged, the computational complexity has effectively reducing by reducing the rank of the matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 and 5, the average bit error rates (BERs) of the IEKFS with N S = 5 are compared with those of the simple KF-based equalizer, LMMSE equalizer, LMMSE-ISDIC [9], combined Kalman receiver [23], and QRD-M [25], as well as with the MFB. The simple KF-based equalizer executes only (26) with the initial s k = 0 Ni×1 and v k = 1 Ni×1 . The performance of the LMMSE equalizer is based on the system model in (43).…”
Section: A Ber Comparison With Other Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The per-path KF applied in this condition has been analyzed in [21]- [23] (called VSSO KF associate to a DTE channel channel). But in practice, the physical multi-path delays are not ensured to be multiples of T s , thus F H p F p = N p I L , or equivalently the DTE channel is correlated.…”
Section: ) Comparison With the Joint Multi-path Kfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will show through simulations that the proposed estimator provides as good a performance as the highdimensional KF, with reduced complexity in case the number of multi-path components is small compared to the number of pilot subcarriers. This condition is generally true and necessary to the VSSO method [21], [22]. Another interesting aspect of this study, in addition to being a comprehensive study, is that the expression of the asymptotic variance performance of the proposed estimator is provided for the first to third orders of the RW model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%