2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2015.09.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A low-cost centimeter-level acoustic localization system without time synchronization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last years, the BeepBeep strategy has become a popular choice for estimating the range between two devices having acoustic emitters and receivers [13], [14]. The main advantage of the BeepBeep technique is that it does not require node synchronization.…”
Section: A Beepbeepmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the last years, the BeepBeep strategy has become a popular choice for estimating the range between two devices having acoustic emitters and receivers [13], [14]. The main advantage of the BeepBeep technique is that it does not require node synchronization.…”
Section: A Beepbeepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the ranging accuracy depends both on the signal propagation speed and the precision of the TOA measurement, acoustic signals are usually preferred because their relative low speed [10]- [12]. In typical WASNs, TOA measurements are often performed with pairs of nodes taking timestamps of their respective local clock at the moment when the test signal is emitted or received [13], [14]. Possible sources of error include clock skew/drift between devices, misalignment between timestamps and actual signal emissions, and errors in detecting the arrival of the sound signals [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-cost acoustic ranging technology is the base-stone of this kind of indoor localization and navigation systems. Most of the prototype systems are using time of arrival (TOA) estimation of an acoustic chirp signal to realize ranging based positioning [1], [7], [8], [9], [10], because TOA is apparently the most widely used ranging technique in ranging systems [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the similarities between acoustic ranging, radar systems and IR-UWB, a fixed-threshold based MF method is widely used to realize TOA estimation of acoustic chirp signals, based on an assumption of full prior knowledge of the source signals [1], [7], [8], [9], [10], where the TOA value is considered as the time delay of the first path component, which is the direct path in line-of-sight (LOS) scenarios. Unfortunately, this assumption of full prior knowledge of source signals is unrealistic in practical applications, especially in low-cost acoustic ranging systems due to the poor performance of electronic components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these approaches, sound-based positioning technologies have the advantages of being fully compatible with commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) smartphones, higher positioning accuracy than other technologies and low-cost infrastructure, and, thus, have attracted researchers’ attention. Quite a few systems have been designed and developed in the last decade in this area, aiming to introduce a reliable and practical technology for smartphone indoor localization [1,5,6,7,8,9]. However, from the results of Microsoft Indoor Localization Competition 2016 [10], the performance of sound localization systems is seriously impaired by indoor multipath propagation and the non-line-of-sight (NLOS) phenomenon in the real world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%