Proceedings of the Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI 2017 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3060403.3060455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Low-Cost GPS Spoofing Detector Design for Internet of Things (IoT) Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many GNSS anti-spoofing countermeasures have been proposed, which were classified in a 2012 paper by Jafarnia-Jahromi et al in [17]. These broadly rely either upon GNSSspecific factors such as measuring clock consistency [3] or correlating with other satellite signals, cryptographic authentication, or signal processing methods such as measuring signal quality or spatially correlating the received signals. However, countermeasures based on signal processing methods are considered impractical in most contexts, since GNSS is often implemented in cheap embedded hardware.…”
Section: A Gnss Spoofingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many GNSS anti-spoofing countermeasures have been proposed, which were classified in a 2012 paper by Jafarnia-Jahromi et al in [17]. These broadly rely either upon GNSSspecific factors such as measuring clock consistency [3] or correlating with other satellite signals, cryptographic authentication, or signal processing methods such as measuring signal quality or spatially correlating the received signals. However, countermeasures based on signal processing methods are considered impractical in most contexts, since GNSS is often implemented in cheap embedded hardware.…”
Section: A Gnss Spoofingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide local time reference based validation, [13,14] propose a method based on Kalman filters to track the clock and frequency offset between the GNSS receiver oscillator and an off-the-shelf, inexpensive temperature compensated oscillator (TCXO). The performance is measured based on the attack proposed in [22], where GNSS signals are progressively delayed, forcing the GNSS receiver to deviate from the ground truth time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without (guaranteed) network connectivity, time-based detection can rely on the on-board capabilities of an enhanced GNSS receiver, notably its on-board clock [9]. Adversaryinduced degradation of the time solution, manifesting itself as variations in the GNSS time rate and skewing, can be captured by taking advantage of on-board oscillators [13][14][15]. Intuitively, the progression of the GNSS receiver time should match the one provided by the local oscillator, if it is sufficiently stable during the period of observation [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The University of Ontario have successfully implemented a method that identifies spoofing attacks by the strong correlation between spoofed satellites signal parameters due to the nature of single transmitter spoofing apparatus inability to fake the multipath channel nature of a true GPS constellation (Li & Wang, 2016). A low-cost defense implementation based on free-running crystal oscillator comparison to received GPS signal timing has been proposed for Internet of Things (IoT) devices in (Arafin et al, 2017). This method would require no additional RF components or advanced signal processing techniques.…”
Section: State-of-the-art Background On Gps Spoofingmentioning
confidence: 99%