2013
DOI: 10.1089/chi.2013.0022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Low-Glycemic-Load versus Low-Fat Diet in the Treatment of Fatty Liver in Obese Children

Abstract: Background: Fatty liver is highly prevalent among obese children and represents a major risk factor for chronic liver diseases and severe metabolic complications.Methods: We randomly assigned 17 obese children 8-17 years of age with fatty liver to either an experimental low-glycemic-load or conventional low-fat diet for 6 months. Participants in both groups received nutrition education and behavioral counseling of equal intensity. The primary outcome was hepatic lipid content measured by proton magnetic resona… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
95
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
95
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We could identify only one study with a diet-only intervention in children with obesity that assessed change in VAT. (40) In this study, change in hepatic lipid content was the primary outcome. The sample size of this study was relatively small with 16 children with obesity with fatty liver that completed the study, nine in the low-fat diet group and seven in the low glycemic load diet group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We could identify only one study with a diet-only intervention in children with obesity that assessed change in VAT. (40) In this study, change in hepatic lipid content was the primary outcome. The sample size of this study was relatively small with 16 children with obesity with fatty liver that completed the study, nine in the low-fat diet group and seven in the low glycemic load diet group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Both diet groups had significant decreases in HFF, from 23.8% at baseline to 15.4% for the low-glycemic group, and 29.3% to 18.7% for the low-fat group with no significant difference between the two groups. There was no significant difference in change of HFF or ALT between the two groups [11]. …”
Section: Nutritionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only in one study, whole‐body fat mass did not change . These anthropometric parameters were not reported in three studies .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%