2003
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-36400-5_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Low-Power Design for an Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Chip

Abstract: We present a VHDL design that incorporates optimizations intended to provide digital signature generation with as little power, space, and time as possible. These three primary objectives of power, size, and speed must be balanced along with other important goals, including flexibility of the hardware and ease of use. The highest-level function offered by our hardware design is Elliptic Curve Optimal El Gamal digital signature generation. Our parameters are defined over the finite field GF (2 178), which gives… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us reduce this vector using rule (4). Hence, the upper half of A 2 (i.e., the m most significant bits) in Eq.…”
Section: Field Squaring Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Let us reduce this vector using rule (4). Hence, the upper half of A 2 (i.e., the m most significant bits) in Eq.…”
Section: Field Squaring Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arithmetic over binary extension fields GF (2 m ) has many important applications, particularly in the theory of error control coding, symmetric block ciphers and elliptic curve cryptosystems [1,2,3,4,5]. Those applications typically require high performance implementation of most if not all of the basic finite field operations such as field addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, exponentiation and square root [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ISE are not useful for 8-bit platforms because slow data transport in 8-bit systems will deteriorate accelerated field operations. Alternatives are heavy-weight accelerators for complete EC operations [4,5,7,8] or hardware-software co-design approaches where com-putational intensive tasks are done by an EC coprocessor [9]. These coprocessors can either calculate all finite field operations [12] or support only multiplication as the most demanding finite field operation [10,11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, they often have hardware support for calculating the modular inverse using the extended Euclidean algorithm. An example is the so-called Domain-Specific Reconfigurable Cryptographic Processor by J. Goodman et al [4] and the GF(2 178 )-EC-processor by R. Schroeppel et al [5]. The latter can calculate inverses only in GF (2 178 ).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%