2019
DOI: 10.1002/mop.31931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A low‐profile high‐gain filtering antenna for fifth generation systems based on nonuniform metasurface

Abstract: This article presents a low‐profile filtering antenna based on nonuniform metasurface for fifth generation (5G) systems at 3.5 GHz. A crossed stub, slotted ground, shorting via, and the nonuniform metasurface is used to achieve high gain and filtering response in lower and upper stopbands. The antenna and the metasurface are printed on Rogers RO4003C (εr = 3.38, tan δ = 0.0027) and Taconic TLX‐9 (εr = 2.5, tan δ = 0.0019), respectively. Measured results show that the antenna has an impedance bandwidth of 3.24 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Again, the gap between the radiator and the MS layer poses the aforementioned problems. Furthermore, radiators are sandwiched between the MS layer and ground plane without the air gap to improve performance keeping the planar structure of the antennas [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Even so, these configurations have the critical drawback of multiple-layers of the printed substrate (MS layer and radiator layer), which increases fabrication cost and complex design architecture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, the gap between the radiator and the MS layer poses the aforementioned problems. Furthermore, radiators are sandwiched between the MS layer and ground plane without the air gap to improve performance keeping the planar structure of the antennas [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Even so, these configurations have the critical drawback of multiple-layers of the printed substrate (MS layer and radiator layer), which increases fabrication cost and complex design architecture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[41]- [43] Substrate Choice A substrate having low permittivity gives enhanced gain, efficiency, wide bandwidth, and a compact antenna while a substrate with high permittivity improves the return loss.…”
Section: Dielectric Lensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently many microstrip filter-antenna designs using different types of substrate materials have been proposed [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71]. In [56], a co-design of a filter-antenna using a multilayered substrate is introduced for future wireless applications.…”
Section: Microstrip Filter-antenna (Filtenna) Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As explained in the literature, many design approaches have been carried out to offer a simple structure and compact size, which can be easily integrated with other RF front end systems. The multilayer structures presented in [56,58,59,62] have not managed these requirements. Moreover, substrate integrated waveguide (SIW) technology and the balun configuration were other notable attempts, as presented in [57] and [61], respectively.…”
Section: Microstrip Filter-antenna (Filtenna) Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%