2013
DOI: 10.1002/mop.27573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A low profile, wideband cavity‐backed bowtie antenna

Abstract: In this article, a cavity‐backed bowtie antenna (CBBA) is proposed and investigated.Compared with the conventional CBBA, parasitic stubs are added to the open‐end of the Bowtie. The parasitic stubs provide capacitive loading and allows the design to exhibit a low profile over a relatively wide bandwidth. Parametric studies are performed to optimize the antenna performance. For verification, a prototype was fabricated and measured. Experimental results show the VSWR of less than 2.0:1 from 1.97 to 8.5 GHz. Howe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the conventional CP crossed dipoles, a circularly polarized Z‐shaped dipole formed by a pair of L‐shaped bending arms is presented in this article. Tapered‐shaped design is employed at the front‐end of each arm to increase the impedance bandwidth . In order to further broaden the AR bandwidth, two coplanar parasitic strips are introduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike the conventional CP crossed dipoles, a circularly polarized Z‐shaped dipole formed by a pair of L‐shaped bending arms is presented in this article. Tapered‐shaped design is employed at the front‐end of each arm to increase the impedance bandwidth . In order to further broaden the AR bandwidth, two coplanar parasitic strips are introduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Tapered-shaped design is employed at the front-end of each arm to increase the impedance bandwidth. 18,19 In order to further broaden the AR bandwidth, two coplanar parasitic strips are introduced. The Z-shaped dipole antenna is simply fed by a printed balun, which is usually used to feed dual-polarized dipole antenna 20 to achieve balanced feeding and wideband impedance matching.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First are aircoupled antennas such as horn antennas [6], [7], the tapered slot antennas (TSA), and their variants [8], [9], which are normally 40-50 cm above the ground surface. Another type concludes many planar antennas that are suitable for working close to the ground, such as loaded dipole [10], spiral [11], [12], microstrip monopole [2], [13], [14], the bowtie antenna and its variants [15], [16]. The groundcoupled antennas could work tightly against or 5-10cm above the ground surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A planar open sleeve structure successfully used for the broadband/multiband dipole antenna was proposed by Spence [14]; however, its ability for widen the bandwidth is limited because of only one resonant point produced in the required band. Dipole antennas with wide bandwidth in [15–18] are proposed and in authors’ previous work [19, 20], impedance bandwidths of about 87% (VSWR ≤ 2) and 58.6% (VSWR ≤ 1.5) for wideband patch antennas with coupling feed are achieved; however, the unidirectional radiation characteristics of these antennas in the H ‐plane are obtained. Owing to the asymmetry of these antennas unit structure in the H ‐plane, the un‐roundness of the array composed of the units will become worse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the asymmetry of these antennas unit structure in the H ‐plane, the un‐roundness of the array composed of the units will become worse. That is to say, these antenna structures proposed in [15–20] would not be good candidates as the unit of the omnidirectional array.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%