1985
DOI: 10.1137/0214050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Lower Bound for the Formula Size of Rational Functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two reasons behind this generalization are: One, to accommodate the power of exponentiation -if we take the e-th power of a read-k formula using a product gate, the 'read' of the resulting formula goes up to ek -we would like to avoid this superfluous blow up in read. Two, a read-k formula has size O(kn), which severely hinders its power of computation -for instance, determinant and permanent cannot even be expressed in this model when k is a constant [Kal85]. This calls for the following definition.…”
Section: A Tale Of Two Pits (And Three Lower Bounds)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two reasons behind this generalization are: One, to accommodate the power of exponentiation -if we take the e-th power of a read-k formula using a product gate, the 'read' of the resulting formula goes up to ek -we would like to avoid this superfluous blow up in read. Two, a read-k formula has size O(kn), which severely hinders its power of computation -for instance, determinant and permanent cannot even be expressed in this model when k is a constant [Kal85]. This calls for the following definition.…”
Section: A Tale Of Two Pits (And Three Lower Bounds)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of substantial progress on this general question has led to focus on the question of proving better lower bounds for restricted and more structured subclasses of arithmetic circuits. Arithmetic formulas [Kal85], non-commutative arithmetic circuits [Nis91], algebraic branching programs [Kum17], and low depth arithmetic circuits [NW97, GK98, GR00, Raz10, GKKS14, FLMS14, KLSS14, KS14,KS17] are some such subclasses which have been studied from this perspective. For an overview of the definition of these models and the state of art for lower bounds for them, we refer the reader to the surveys of Shpilka and Yehudayoff [SY10] and Saptharishi [Sap16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that finding a Jacobian-type polynomial that captures algebraic independence in any characteristic p > 0 is a natural question in algebra and geometry. Furthermore, Jacobian has recently found several applications in complexity theorycircuit lower bound proofs [Kal85,ASSS12], pseudo-random objects construction [DGW09,Dvi09], identity testing [BMS11,ASSS12], cryptography [DGRV11], program invariants [L'v84, Kay09], and control theory [For91,DF92]. Thus, a suitably effective Jacobian-type criterion is desirable to make these applications work for any field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%