2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000170293.81234.f0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Lumbar Classification of Scoliosis in the Adult Patient: Preliminary Approach

Abstract: A simple classification of adult scoliosis was developed based on frontal and sagittal plane standing radiographs. With increasing type (from I to III), self-reported pain and disability increased. This result was reflected in the treatment approach as well, with surgical rates increasing from types I to III. Further refinement is important to develop an all inclusive and sufficiently descriptive system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
46
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
46
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have been contradictory on the relationship between scoliosis and symptoms [4,17,19,20]. We have not set out to and are not able to make any comment on the relationship between the presence of deformity and symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have been contradictory on the relationship between scoliosis and symptoms [4,17,19,20]. We have not set out to and are not able to make any comment on the relationship between the presence of deformity and symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Previous studies have looked at the prevalence of lumbar scoliosis in symptomatic and non-symptomatic groups. Prevalence has ranged from 1.4-68% [2][3][4][5]. The prevalence of spondylolisthesis in the sagittal plane has been investigated by other authors [6,7] but coronal plane deformity, and in particular lateral listhesis, has not been well characterised.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Schwab grading system was used to classify the deformity as it has recently been validated and shown to have excellent inter-and intra-observer reliability [25][26][27]. In this series, only one observer was used to classify the deformity (A Irwin).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients were consented and Caldicott approval gained. Patients with radiographic evidence of spinal deformity were analysed separately and their lumbar deformity graded using the Schwab grading system [25][26][27] (Table 1; Fig. 3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current classifications of adult deformity [1,[8][9][10][11], have outlined the etiological aspects of adult deformity and outcome-related morphological aspects, improving our comprehension of the pathology, informing about the cause of the deformity (Aebi's classification) or establishing criteria of severity of the curve (Schwab's classification). One of the limitations of the current classifications is their inability to identify candidates for selective fusion of one area of the curve or to assist the surgeon with surgical planning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%