A MAC Protocol Using Separate Wakeup Slots for Sensor Network

Pak, Jinsuk; Son, Ji‐Won; Han, Kijun

doi:10.1007/11751588_123

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Table 12 shows the list of Hybrid with their impact factors. Bachir et al, 66 Huang et al, 67 and Langendoen 65 have categorized TRAMA 170 as Frame-based protocol and WiseMAC 141 as Asynchronous protocol, whereas 74 83.40 2004 SCP-MAC 126 61.25 2006 DSMAC 41 30.80 2004 RMAC 36 29.57 2007 DW-MAC 127 28.17 2008 PMAC 128 27.89 2005 FPA 76 16.56 2005 GSA 76 16.56 2005 MSMAC 129 9.40 2004 U-MAC 42 5.56 2005 RL-MAC 130 4.50 2006 Q-MAC 43 4.38 2006 Optimized MAC 131 3.50 2008 nanoMAC 132 2.75 2006 ADCA 133 2.00 2008 RMAC 85 1.88 2006 E2RMAC 86 1.43 2007 SWMAC 134 1.25 2006 E2MAC 135 0.94 1998 CAP: common active period; IF: impact factor. 53 129.88 2006 PS-CSMA 140 94.17 2002 Channel poling 126 61.25 2006 RI-MAC 59 54.33 2008 STEM 55 52.58 2002 WiseMAC 141 32.30 2004 SP 142 31.00 2005 RATE EST 143 28.89 2005 Sift 138 28.09 2003 A-MAC 60 28.00 2010 UBMAC 144 25.40 2009 PW-MAC 145 25.00 2011 Koala 57 21.83 2008 PS-ALOHA 44 21.17 2002 TICER 52 18.00 2004 RICER 52 18.00 2004 Cycled receiver 52 18.00 2004 CMAC …”

Section: Coverage Of Mac Protocols By Reviewersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Meta-survey on medium access control surveys in wireless sensor networks

Arain

Ghani

2016

International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Medium access control layer has been the hotbed of research in the field of wireless sensor networks since huge amount of research in wireless sensor networks has focused on saving energy and lately reducing latency. For the most part, medium access control layer solutions in wireless sensor networks are entrusted to save energy, to reduce latency, and at times to ensure reliability perhaps through cross-layer solutions. In this article, we review the surveys at medium access control layer and point to readers some of their strengths and relevancies to medium access control layer protocols. Furthermore, we classify the surveys subject-wise to show trend and usability. To cross compare, we devise a unified lexicon for the purpose and expose the coverage given to the wireless sensor networks' medium access control protocols by different studies. We present medium access control solutions' popularity on a known but hitherto unused metric: average citations/year from over 200 medium access control solutions. Our approach to assess the impact factor of protocols for ranking is validated prima facie from the coverage of these solutions by top ranking surveys. We believe it is the widest of such a study involving more than 30 survey papers and over 200 wireless sensor network medium access control protocols.

show abstract

Section: Coverage Of Mac Protocols By Reviewersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Meta-survey on medium access control surveys in wireless sensor networks

Arain

Ghani

2016

International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…SWMAC (Separate Wakeup MAC) [7]: in this protocol, the active period is divided into slots to reduce its duration, and then each node is assigned a reception slot during which Figure 3. Future request-to-send scenario [5] it wakes up to receive data.…”

Section: T-mac [5]mentioning

confidence: 99%